This paper discusses the theoretical frameworks for a corporate disclosure research. It introduces the general nature and types of theories. It then compares and contrasts views of what constitutes a theory. There was no single view of theory. There were differences in approaches and interpretations. The conception of a theory and its relationship with research is discussed in light of both quantitative and qualitative methods of research and their contribution to theory are assessed. Both quantitative and qualitative methods contributed to theory building, theory testing, and substantiating, or refuting their propositions. Although, positive accounting theory had grown as one of the most significant accounting research program, the broad theories of accounting included interpretive and normative theories as well. The review of the literature revealed that there were a number of theories associated with corporate accounting and disclosure, amongst them were agency theory, signaling theory, the accountability theory, legitimacy theory, contingency theory, stakeholder theory, and resource dependency theory.