2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0732-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researches in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Shifting Focus, Paradigms, and Methodologies

Abstract: corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate social performance, methodological review, literature review, research paradigms, paradigm shifts, M14, N01,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
0
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
4
115
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is also similar to that obtained by McWilliams and Siegel (2000) and Lin et al (2008), that is, that CSR does not have an impact on financial performance in the short-term but it does offer a remarkable long-term fiscal advantage. Most researchers have agreed on the fact that socially responsible behaviour enhances the long-term sustainability and growth of the business (Taneja et al, 2011). The results obtained are in the research stream related to instrumental theory which argues that CSR influences FP because good management implies positive relationships with key stakeholders, which in turn has a positive impact on FP (Donaldson and Preston, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This conclusion is also similar to that obtained by McWilliams and Siegel (2000) and Lin et al (2008), that is, that CSR does not have an impact on financial performance in the short-term but it does offer a remarkable long-term fiscal advantage. Most researchers have agreed on the fact that socially responsible behaviour enhances the long-term sustainability and growth of the business (Taneja et al, 2011). The results obtained are in the research stream related to instrumental theory which argues that CSR influences FP because good management implies positive relationships with key stakeholders, which in turn has a positive impact on FP (Donaldson and Preston, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As noted by Halme and Laurila (2009), and Stuebs and Sun (2009), a recent literature review (Beurden and Gössling, 2008), two meta-analyses (Margolis and Walsh, 2003;Orlitzky et al, 2003), and several recent studies (e.g., Brammer and Millington, 2008) support the positive link. Additionally, most of the studies have reached a common conclusion that CSR behavior contributes to a firm's long-term sustainability and growth (Taneja et al, 2011). Therefore, although there is no straightforward evidence of the relationship between CSR and financial performance, we expect that CSR activities undertaken by firms will positively affect their performance.…”
Section: Impact Of Csr On Financial Performancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The fourth and the last version of the paradigm are considered as the set of rules that can be used for generalizations, models, values, and examples of solutions for similar researches done in the given field (Jeanjean & Ramirez, 2009). Taneja, Taneja, and Gupta (2011) explained that such perspectives help researchers to take philosophical examinations of phenomena's ontological and epistemological assumptions. Model, on the other hand, is a semantic conception of a theory.…”
Section: Asian Journal Of Finance and Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%