2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01351-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Researchers using environmental DNA must engage ethically with Indigenous communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, human dispersal into Australia and North America may have led to megafaunal extinctions, declines and range shifts which could be examined in time and space with these types of data in combination with modelling of interactions among taxa and changes in N e through time (e.g. predator-prey models) [74]. Because megafaunal extinctions are often complex and multifactorial, a multi-taxon palaeogenomics approach will be especially valuable for assessment of the respective roles of human and non-human environmental changes in species extinction.…”
Section: (B) Correlating Human and Animal Demographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, human dispersal into Australia and North America may have led to megafaunal extinctions, declines and range shifts which could be examined in time and space with these types of data in combination with modelling of interactions among taxa and changes in N e through time (e.g. predator-prey models) [74]. Because megafaunal extinctions are often complex and multifactorial, a multi-taxon palaeogenomics approach will be especially valuable for assessment of the respective roles of human and non-human environmental changes in species extinction.…”
Section: (B) Correlating Human and Animal Demographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because megafaunal extinctions are often complex and multifactorial, a multi-taxon palaeogenomics approach will be especially valuable for assessment of the respective roles of human and non-human environmental changes in species extinction. In this regard, we stress that ethical considerations, engagement with indigenous communities, as well as careful interpretation of the narrative stemming from these discoveries, will be essential to avoid any potential stigmatisation of indigenous peoples [ 75 ].…”
Section: Integrating Data From Humans Animals and Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is a clear impetus to engage with mana whenua when seeking to apply genetic/genomic tools to modern samples (Collier-Robinson et al 2019, Rayne et al 2020, and when identifying the whakapapa of human remains (e.g., , there is as yet no standard practice for engagement relating to the use of historic samples originating from non-human organisms, whether held in museums or private collections. In addition, the legal, ethical, and social ramifications associated with environmental DNA research in an Aotearoa New Zealand context are as yet unclear, with potential unforeseen impacts on Indigenous communities where such data may identify (or fail to identify) links between Indigenous communities and the land (see Handsley-Davis et al, 2020 for details). Further, emerging microbiome studies in conservation consider not just the genome of a focal taxon but also the genomes of its associated microbial communities (see Part 2: 8 Microbiomes), which also contribute to the mauri of species and ecosystems.…”
Section: Considerations For Taonga Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is extensive scholarship regarding data sovereignty pertaining to human genetic/genomic data, growing scholarship pertaining to culturally significant species (e.g., Caron et al, 2020;Claw et al, 2018;Collier-Robinson et al, 2019;Handsley-Davis et al, 2020;Hudson et al, 2020;Koia & Shepherd, 2020;Potenski, 2020;Walter et al, 2020), and the establishment of initiatives such as Te Nohonga Kaitiaki (www.genomicsaotearoa.org.nz/projects/te-nohonga-kaitiaki), Traditional Knowledge Labels (localcontexts.org/tk-labels/; Anderson, 2012) and Biocultural Labels (localcontexts.org/labels/biocultural-labels/; . As such, we will not discuss these matters in detail here, but we strongly encourage researchers and practitioners to explore these existing resources, and to centre mana whenua needs, aspirations and expertise throughout all aspects of research and practice.…”
Section: Data Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such antagonism often eclipses examples of Indigenous groups who participate in aDNA research (e.g., Mata-M ıguez et al, 2012;Rasmussen et al, 2014;Scheib et al, 2018;Tackney et al, 2015). Indigenous peoples are themselves active in pushing for greater control of both the process and products emanating from such research (Handsley-Davis et al, 2020;Hudson et al, 2020;Matisoo-Smith, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%