Researcher Perspectives on Conflicts of Interest: A Qualitative Analysis of Views from Academia

Abstract

The increasing interconnectedness of academic research and external industry has left research vulnerable to conflicts of interest. These conflicts have the potential to undermine the integrity of scientific research as well as to threaten public trust in scientific findings. The present effort sought to identify themes in the perspectives of faculty researchers regarding conflicts of interest. Think-aloud interview responses were qualitatively analyzed in an effort to provide insights with regard to appropriate ways to address the threat of conflicts of interest in research. Themes in participant responses included disclosure of conflicts of interest, self-removal from situations where conflict exists, accommodation of conflict, denial of the existence of conflict, and recognition of complexity of situations involving conflicts of interest. Moral disengagement operations are suggested to explain the appearance of each identified theme. In addition, suggestions for best practices regarding addressing conflicts of interest given these themes in faculty perspectives are provided.

“Always read the small print”: a case study of commercial research funding, disclosure and agreements with Coca-Cola

“…Turning to implications for COIs, this study adds to a growing body of literature of their limited usefulness. Qualitative studies with researchers reveal diverse interpretations of what COIs and influence mean [26]. It is also easy for COIs to be inadequately reported.…”

The influence of ‘moral disengagement’ on conflict of interest: insights for dermatology from social psychology and qualitative research

“…Mecca et al . reported five ways in which academics might respond to conflicts of interest in research: (i) disclosure, which included transferring the decision to someone else, seeking advice, making others aware and following set disclosure procedures; (ii) taking yourself away from the conflict of interest completely; (iii) working around the conflict of interest by accommodating it; (iv) denying that a conflict of interest exists at all; and lastly (v) recognizing the inherent complexity involved in conflict of interest.…”

Clinical trials in mild traumatic brain injury

“…The discussion of conflicts of interest in the physician-industry relations area have been broader than strictly the implications of corporate sponsorship of research (Angell et al, 2008;Rothman et al, 2008). From the perspective of academic investigators, there is a strong belief that disclosure of potential conflicts is an acceptable and sufficient tool for management (Glaser et al, 2005;Mecca et al, 2015). The importance of these perceptions may be enhanced by public sensitivity to the concussion problem.…”