Research Training as Occupational Socialization: Doing Research and Becoming Researchers

Abstract

Social science research training is de-facto occupational socialisation to researcher-roles. To do research, trainees need to develop and demonstrate advanced scholarship that complies with disciplinary norms and perform tasks to pre-determined standards. Functionalist approaches to occupational socialization underpin the performative and standardised approach to research training common in universities. But there is more to research training than doing research. If truly successful, trainees will become researchers. They will take on the researcher-role and make it their own. Interpretive approaches to occupational socialization help illuminate intra-and inter-personal dimensions of role-taking and role-making, however this approach is rarely used to inform research training strategies. Occasional scholarship reveals ad-hoc application on interpretive approaches to research trainee experience (eg., "the journey") supervisor experience (eg., "emotional burden of supervision"), research training methods such as peer-learning (eg., informal or fabricated groups, research micro-climates), or research training pedagogy (eg., collaborative learning, coproduction). Recently, interpretive approaches have been used to inform career-planning strategies for PhD graduates (eg., "Vitae") but this is yet to systematically inform institutional strategies for research-training. To more effectively and efficiently facilitate researcher-role development, research training should consider occupational socialization as an organizing framework, and utilize performative and interpretive approaches to role development. Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 2;2015 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911 AbstractSocial science research training is de-facto occupational socialisation to researcher-roles. To do research, trainees need to develop and demonstrate advanced scholarship that complies with disciplinary norms and perform tasks to pre-determined standards. Functionalist approaches to occupational socialization underpin the performative and standardised approach to research training common in universities. But there is more to research training than doing research. If truly successful, trainees will become researchers. They will take on the researcher-role and make it their own. Interpretive approaches to occupational socialization help illuminate intra-and inter-personal dimensions of role-taking and role-making, however this approach is rarely used to inform research training strategies. Occasional scholarship reveals ad-hoc application on interpretive approaches to research trainee experience (e.g., "the journey") supervisor experience (e.g., "emotional burden of supervision"), research training methods such as peer-learning (e.g., informal or fabricated groups, research micro-climates), or research training pedagogy (e.g., collaborative learning, co-production). Recently, interpretive approaches have been used to inform career-planning strategies for PhD graduates (e.g., "Vitae") but this is yet to systematically inform institutio...

Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices

“…The extent of influence depends on several things: Colleagues: Other members of the group to which they belong and their supervisors/mentors. It is a well‐known feature of ECR life that their choices must suit the other parties involved in their undertakings (Brechelmacher, Park, Ates, & Campbell, ; Cusick, ). Thus, for the great majority of those ECRs in the USA and the majority in the UK who research in a group, journal choice is a group decision.…”

"Mind the Gap": The Transformative Learning Process of Second Language Practitioners When Becoming Scholars

“…Research can be a very lonely process; this loneliness can carry with it confusion, frustration, and the risk of losing one's voice (Hughes & Tight, 2013). In order to tackle these anticipated difficulties, we have dedicated a great deal of effort to building a supportive cohort through much group work, with the reasoning that this could either facilitate or impede students' development during the whole doctorate process (Cusick, 2015). For some participants, this expectation was perceived with reservations.…”

“…It is like having it both ways: encouraging learners to work independently, inquire and become accustomed to the individual aspects of researching while, at the same time, understanding the benefits and the habits that an effective cohort can contribute at any step of the way. Lastly, as discussed earlier, instructors' role in doctorate programs' preliminary courses are important precursors (Cusick, 2015). Part of the goal should be to "walk the talk" and share areas of uncertainty, provide guidance and confidence in the process and, at the same time, allow for independent work and decrease the dependency of students.…”

Seeking “better ways”: early career faculty researcher development

“…Other studies and conceptual papers have explored the role of relationships and personal intentions in navigating the post-PhD transition (McAlpine et al , 2013), the association between mentored learning experiences (among other “researcher development interventions”) and external funding (Mazmanian et al , 2014), organizational strategies for facilitating researcher development (Browning et al , 2016; Cusick, 2015) and the role of research teams in facilitating transformative learning among doctoral students and faculty members (Snipes and LePeau, 2017). Collectively, these studies offer a foundation for future scholars to explore researcher development in contexts within and beyond higher education.…”