Research topics and implementation trends on automotive head-up display systems

Betancur, J. Alejandro; Villa-Espinal, Jesús; Osorio-Gómez, Gilberto; Cuéllar, Sergio; Suárez, Daniel R.

doi:10.1007/s12008-016-0350-3

Cited by 29 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Automotive HUD systems differ radically from each other, mainly because these do not follow driver-based interaction design patterns [3], and therefore among all possible options it is not clear which interaction method is the most advisable (from a safety-oriented point of view) for a specific HUD visual interface proposal. According to this, the following three interaction methods were tested and compared for a specific HUD visual interface:…”

Section: Problem Understandingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding previous studies about the future implementation trends of the T interaction methods in HUDs [3], a deeper exploration about this was proposed; specifically, it was tested a T interaction method (T') that allow to access the visible options of the proposed visual interface directly by doing a hand gesture, avoiding to navigate inside this visual interface by using the backward, forward, and select commands. Also, this T' interaction method was designed to be used without moving the hand away from the steering wheel.…”

Section: Touchless Explorationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to the bibliometric classification method proposed by Betancur et al [3], most of the studies about HUD interfaces are focused on proposing a faster driver acceptation, by using commonly touchless [9], haptic [16] and voice commands [22]. Consequently, in the present study a set of experiments were developed to determine the most safety-oriented methods for interacting with a proposed HUD visual interface; this, with the aim to analyse how the obtained results depend not only on the proposed HUD visual interface, but also on the way it is handled.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

User experience comparison among touchless, haptic and voice Head-Up Displays interfaces in automobiles

Betancur

Gómez

Merienne

et al. 2018

Int J Interact Des Manuf

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper evaluates driving experiences when using a Head-Up Display (HUD) system by different interaction methods, since HUDs in automotive market do not follow standard interaction methods (Betancur et al. in Int J Interact Des Manuf 12(1):199-214, [3]), and therefore it is difficult to identify what types of these methods are the most appropriated in terms of usability for being implemented in HUDs. This paper focuses on comparing the mental workload that a driver could experience while interacting with a specific HUD visual interface by touchless gestures, haptic or voice methods. Then, test subjects (n 15) performed conjointly a driving activity and a set of in-vehicle tasks by using these interaction methods throughout a HUD. The experiments show that the haptic method was better accepted than the touchless gestures and voice methods. Nevertheless, the touchless gestures method was explored under some specific usability configurations, in order to demonstrate that it was not significantly different from the haptic method. Keywords Head-Up Display • Human-machine interface • Vehicle 1 Introduction Regarding the authors' perspective, the Interactive approach concept explores different ways for interacting with a technical system, mainly looking for enhancing the user experience and performance. Consequently, this paper proposes a comparison among different interaction methods applied to a HUD system, in order to identify the best and worst qualities of every one of these from drivers' point of view. According to the above, the interactive development here

show abstract

Section: Problem Understandingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Touchless Explorationmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

User experience comparison among touchless, haptic and voice Head-Up Displays interfaces in automobiles

Betancur

Gómez

Merienne

et al. 2018

Int J Interact Des Manuf

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Different types of transparent interaction systems and augmented interfaces, that keep the user visual attention in line with operation, is currently an area of state-of-the-art interest [5], empowered by higher embedded computation power and increased availability of visualization technology. The field itself isn't new, mixed reality in terms of Head-Up Displays (HUDs) have been used for a long time in specific areas, aerospace being one early adopter.…”

Section: A Summary Of Background and Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Interaction Design with Information Intense Heavy Vehicles

Wallmyr

2017

Proceedings of the IS4SI 2017 Summit DIGITALISATION FOR a SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY, Gothenburg, Sweden, 12–16 June 2017.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As systems, for example vehicle systems, get increasingly autonomous and information intense, the information exchanged with the user, i.e., the operator, are increasingly becoming a designed interaction. This work investigates how interaction technologies, interaction design principles, and machine information systems can be used to provide user experiences and efficient interaction between the operator and industrial mobile machines; for example, agricultural machines and construction machines. In this pursuit the research aims to explore the use of mixed reality interaction and visual presentation using see-through interfaces and symbolic metaphors, to enhance the interaction for operators working with these types of machines.

show abstract

“…HE vehicle head-up display (HUD) system can display driving information such as vehicle speed, fuel consumption, warning signals and navigation arrows to the driver through the windshield or combiner [1]- [4]. With HUD, the driver always looks straight ahead on the road without frequently moving the sight to see the dashboard, thus improving driving safety [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Multi-Plane Augmented Reality Head-Up Display System Based on Volume Holographic Optical Elements With Large Area

Liu

2021

IEEE Photonics J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The traditional head-up display (HUD) system has the disadvantages of a small area and a single display plane, here we propose and design an augmented reality (AR) HUD system with multi-plane, large area, high diffraction efficiency and a single picture generation unit (PGU) based on holographic optical elements (HOEs). Since volume HOEs have excellent angle selectivity and wavelength selectivity, HOEs of different wavelengths can be designed to display images in different planes. Experimental and simulated results verify the feasibility of this method. Experimental results show that the diffraction efficiencies of the red, green and blue HOEs are 75.2%, 73.1% and 67.5%. And the size of HOEs is 20cm×15cm. Moreover, the three HOEs of red, green and blue display images at different depths of 150cm, 500cm and 1000cm, respectively. In addition, the field of view (FOV) and eye-box (EB) of the system are 12°×10°a nd 9.5cm×11.2cm. Furthermore, the light transmittance of the system has reached 60%. It is believed that this technique can be applied to the augmented reality navigation display of vehicles and aviation.

show abstract

Research topics and implementation trends on automotive head-up display systems

Cited by 29 publications

References 15 publications

User experience comparison among touchless, haptic and voice Head-Up Displays interfaces in automobiles

User experience comparison among touchless, haptic and voice Head-Up Displays interfaces in automobiles

Exploring Interaction Design with Information Intense Heavy Vehicles

A Multi-Plane Augmented Reality Head-Up Display System Based on Volume Holographic Optical Elements With Large Area

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About