1993
DOI: 10.1016/0748-5751(93)90017-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research, teaching, and service in promotion and tenure decisions of accounting faculty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative importance of each aspect often varies with the specific needs of the organisation at a particular point in time, the urgency of those needs as well as the research intensity of the university (Street et al, 1993;Higher Education Academy, 2009). These aspects are conditioned by a whole range of essentially random factors, including the characteristics of the set of applicants.…”
Section: Pre-eminent Role Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative importance of each aspect often varies with the specific needs of the organisation at a particular point in time, the urgency of those needs as well as the research intensity of the university (Street et al, 1993;Higher Education Academy, 2009). These aspects are conditioned by a whole range of essentially random factors, including the characteristics of the set of applicants.…”
Section: Pre-eminent Role Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, service is generally rated as less important than either research or teaching and is less likely to lead to career advancement within an institution. In research intensive institutions, the publication of research is a primary vehicle for advancement for the vast majority of faculty, and in non-doctoral granting institutions, teaching is emphasized more heavily (Street, Baril, & Benke, 1993). Service, while a factor in performance reviews, is generally ranked after research and teaching in importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strand of literature underlined that the conflict between teaching and research contributes to the failure of accounting education to provide accounting graduates with the competencies expected of them by the profession (Street, Baril & Benke, 1993;Manakyan & Tanner, 1994;Lindsay & Campbell, 1995;Murdoch & Guy, 2002;Duncan & Schmutte, 2006;Hill & Milner, 2007). Several scholars (Kerr, 1975;Schultz, Meade & Khurana, 1989;Tang & Chamberlain, 1997;Porter & Carr, 1999), pointed out that the evaluation of academic performance is based on the quality of research and publications; thus, this reward system provides little incentive for academics to develop new teaching programs (Marsh & Hattie, 2002;Hardré & Collmann, 2012).…”
Section: Professional Skill Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth highlighting how there are different studies on the factors that increase the gap in expectations; some of them are focused on subjects that perceive the gap: academics and employers (Armitage, 1991;Novin, Fetyko, & Tucker, 1997;Theuri & Gunn, 1998;Francis & Minchington, 1999) and students (Shivaswamy & Hanks, 1985a, 1985bKochanek & Norgaard, 1985;Felton, Buhr & Northey, 1994;Marriott & Marriott, 2003;Sikka et al, 2007); while other studies highlight the institutional constraints (Street, Baril & Benke, 1993;Manakyan & Tanner, 1994;Lindsay & Campbell, 1995;Murdoch & Guy, 2002;Duncan & Schmutte, 2006;Hill & Milner, 2007) as well as the ineffectiveness of university teaching (Wolk, Schmidt & Sweeney, 1997;Swain & Stout, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%