2007
DOI: 10.4314/njm.v15i4.37249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research proposal writing: Breaking the myth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a proposal one needs to show how the researcher's work fits into what is already known about the topic and what new paradigm will it add to the literature, while specifying the research question that research will answer, establishing its significance and its implications to answer the questions (Nte & Awi, 2006). The written proposal should be capable enough to persuade the evaluation committee on credibility, achievability, practicality and reproducibility of the research design (Saunderlin, 1994).…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a proposal one needs to show how the researcher's work fits into what is already known about the topic and what new paradigm will it add to the literature, while specifying the research question that research will answer, establishing its significance and its implications to answer the questions (Nte & Awi, 2006). The written proposal should be capable enough to persuade the evaluation committee on credibility, achievability, practicality and reproducibility of the research design (Saunderlin, 1994).…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proposal needs to show how your work fits into what is already known about the topic and what new paradigm will it add to the literature, while specifying the question that the research will answer, establishing its significance, and the implications of the answer. [ 2 ] The proposal must be capable of convincing the evaluation committee about the credibility, achievability, practicality and reproducibility (repeatability) of the research design. [ 3 ] Four categories of audience with different expectations may be present in the evaluation committees, namely academic colleagues, policy-makers, practitioners and lay audiences who evaluate the research proposal.…”
Section: Basic Requirements Of a Research Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%