Ecscw 2009 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-854-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Project as Boundary Object: negotiating the conceptual design of a tool for International Development

Abstract: This paper reflects on the relationship between who one designs for and what one designs in the unstructured space of designing for political change; in particular, for supporting "International Development" with ICT. We look at an interdisciplinary research project with goals and funding, but no clearly defined beneficiary group at start, and how amorphousness contributed to impact. The reported project researched a bridging tool to connect producers with consumers across global contexts and show players in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Members' contributions are crucial, not only in attending and following Sue's lead, but in shaping goals and setting a tone for the reflective work. Light et al [16] note the semi arbitrary nature of co-design, where the group determines the theme/problem and this then determines the group. We saw this process here.…”
Section: Meaningfulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members' contributions are crucial, not only in attending and following Sue's lead, but in shaping goals and setting a tone for the reflective work. Light et al [16] note the semi arbitrary nature of co-design, where the group determines the theme/problem and this then determines the group. We saw this process here.…”
Section: Meaningfulnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the recognition of the consequences of boundaries and the authority and agency that are designed into processes and materials (e.g. Light & Anderson, 2009;Kimble et al, 2010) extends the theory into critical authoring and making of systems, artefacts, documents, concepts and other objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Westbrook & Finn, 2012;Worrall, 2013;Fleischmann, 2006) and computer supported cooperative work (e.g. Roth & McGinn 1998;Light & Anderson, 2009). …”
Section: Concept Of Boundary Object In the Information Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An emphasis on a transnational lens suggests an important resistance to thinking of ''other cultures'' as phenomena Introduction 3 that simply happen ''out there'' in the world (Taylor, 2011). This requires decentering the researcher's or designer's sense of working from a privileged position, reaching out to communities in need, and shifting instead to a sense of researchers, designers, and communities as moving parts of an interconnected network (Light & Anderson, 2009).This special issue of Human-Computer Interaction is dedicated to exploring how and why a transnational lens matters to the study, design, and development of computational systems. We consider this theoretical perspective in terms of both present technology use to construct and manage transnational relations and processes, and the possibilities such a lens opens for future research and design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%