2018
DOI: 10.1360/n972017-00771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research progress of radiation effects mechanisms and experimental techniques in nano-devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the advanced 65 nm CMOS-based EBRAM cells, SEU critical charge declined significantly when compared with sub-micron devices, making the unhardened unit more sensitive to heavy ion irradiation [9,10]. In addition, the carriers created by ionized ions could deposit enough energy in more than one drain regions of off-state MOSFETs in the vicinity, leading to a large MBU rate and high SEU cross section.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Configuration Hardeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the advanced 65 nm CMOS-based EBRAM cells, SEU critical charge declined significantly when compared with sub-micron devices, making the unhardened unit more sensitive to heavy ion irradiation [9,10]. In addition, the carriers created by ionized ions could deposit enough energy in more than one drain regions of off-state MOSFETs in the vicinity, leading to a large MBU rate and high SEU cross section.…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Configuration Hardeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) based Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) possesses plenty of flexible configuration switches and logics to implement million-gate circuits with a very short development time [1,2], which makes it a valuable Integrated Circuit (IC) for an electronic system. However, the Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) based architectures in SRAM-FPGA are very sensitive to radiation effects, which reduces the on-orbit safety and reliability [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate and mitigate the Single Event Effects (SEEs) of SRAM-based FPGAs for potential space applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among them, single-event upset is the most common and typical, mainly occurring in components that store data or instructions. Component errors caused by single event upset belong to soft errors, which can be restored through system reset, reboot, or rewrite [4][5][6][7][8]. Single-event upset is relatively common in the aerospace field, due to long-term exposure of spacecraft to harsh space environments and susceptibility to high-energy particle interference [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%