Research progress of anxiety and depression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Ma, Haiyan; Wang, Xia; ZHANG, Lijuan; WAN, Qin

doi:10.55111/j.issn2709-1961.202106077

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[6] As to many studies, moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) has proven effective in reducing BP. [7,8] Recently, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), which consists of repeated bouts of exercise and rest at varying intensities, has become a popular alternative to MICT due to its relatively high time efficiency and growing body of evidence demonstrating its effectiveness in lowering BP in people with hypertension. [9–13]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A meta-analysis

Shen

et al. 2022

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension to explore more suitable training. Methods: PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2002 and November 2022. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were selected as the effect scale indices for the evaluation of the differences in post-intervention systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), and flow-mediated vasodilation. All these were compared using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0. Results: A total of 13 randomized controlled trials and 442 patients were included. The meta-analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between HIIT and MICT in improving SBP and DBP in patients with hypertension. Subgroup analyses revealed that HIIT was better than MICT in reducing SBP during daytime monitoring (WMD = −4.14, 95%CI: [−6.98, −1.30], P < .001). In addition, HIIT increased flow-mediated vasodilation more than MICT in hypertensive patients (WMD = 2.75, 95%CI: [0.43, 5.07], P = .02). Conclusion: HIIT and MICT have similar effects on the overall resting SBP and DBP in patients with hypertension and prehypertension. However, HIIT is better than MICT at reducing SBP during daytime monitoring. In addition, HIIT can improve vasodilation.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A meta-analysis

Shen

et al. 2022

Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Cross-sectional survey to determine fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Lu,

Yu,

2024

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundFatigue is a prevalent symptom among individuals with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to investigate the status quo and influencing factors of fatigue in patients with SLE, to provide insights to the clinical SLE treatment and care.MethodsWe conducted a longitudinal survey on the fatigue of active SLE patients from June 2022 to November 2023 in our hospital. Fatigue severity scale (FSS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) were used for data collection. Pearson correlation and multiple stepwise regression analysis were conducted to analyze the relevant factors affecting the fatigue level of patients with SLE.ResultsA total of 212 active SLE patients were included, the incidence of fatigue in active SLE patients was 55.66%. There were statistical differences in the fatigue score between SLE patients with different age and course of SLE (all p < 0.05). Fatigue was positively correlated with anxiety (r = 0.559) and depression (r = 0.591) in patients with SLE (all p < 0.05). Multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that age, course of SLE, anxiety and depression were the influencing factors of fatigue in SLE patients (all p < 0.05).ConclusionPatients with SLE exhibit a significant degree of fatigue, which varies with respect to age, disease duration, and the presence of comorbid anxiety and depression. It is imperative that healthcare providers closely monitor the fatigue levels in this patient population and implement targeted interventions to mitigate the impact of fatigue on the quality of life and overall well-being of individuals with SLE.

show abstract

Research progress of anxiety and depression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A meta-analysis

Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: A meta-analysis

Cross-sectional survey to determine fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About