Research on women in labour is ethically unsound

Horsman, E.L.

doi:10.1054/ijoa.2001.0877

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

The Quality Of the Evidence1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2002

2004

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[31][32][33][34][35] Appropriately constituted ethics committees and Institutional Review Boards should themselves be instrumental in assessing and improving the quality of clinical studies at the planning stage. Other websites and resources contain comprehensive advice for ethics committees (A standard for scientific & ethical review of trials: ASSERT, 36 ) not to mention systematic reviewers (Quality of reporting of meta-analyses of randomised trials: QUOROM) 37 and those assessing non-randomised trials (Transparent reporting of evaluations with non-randomised designs: TREND), 38 to name but a few.…”

Section: The Quality Of the Evidencementioning

confidence: 99%