2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-021-09466-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on waterproofing and drainage optimization scheme for karst tunnel lining in water-rich areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through numerical simulation and model testing, three optimised waterproofing and drainage schemes were studied, the results showed that, when conventional waterproofing and drainage schemes are adopted for water-rich karst tunnels, the drainage system cannot effectively reduce the water pressure at the inverted arch of the tunnel. When a longitudinal blind drainage pipe was added at the bottom of the inverted arch, the reduction rate reached 84% and when the central drainage ditch was set at the bottom of the inverted arch, it increased to 96% 27 . Proposed a new concept for a drainage and pressure reduction system at the bottom of a railway tunnel, which can efficiently discharge the accumulated water at the bottom of the tunnel and achieve the goal of reducing water pressure 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through numerical simulation and model testing, three optimised waterproofing and drainage schemes were studied, the results showed that, when conventional waterproofing and drainage schemes are adopted for water-rich karst tunnels, the drainage system cannot effectively reduce the water pressure at the inverted arch of the tunnel. When a longitudinal blind drainage pipe was added at the bottom of the inverted arch, the reduction rate reached 84% and when the central drainage ditch was set at the bottom of the inverted arch, it increased to 96% 27 . Proposed a new concept for a drainage and pressure reduction system at the bottom of a railway tunnel, which can efficiently discharge the accumulated water at the bottom of the tunnel and achieve the goal of reducing water pressure 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is crucial to eliminate how to economically and effectively solve diseases such as high-water pressure causing damage to the above tunnel lining structure. At present, there are many ways to reduce the lining disease, among which an effective and e cient anti-drainage system is currently the mainstream way to reduce the pressure of the tunnel [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [10] used an iterative algorithm to determine the free surface, the author simplified the drainage hole as a straight line to simulate the function of the drainage hole and analyze the influence of drainage system on the seepage field. Zhao et al [11] used numerical simulation and model test to study three waterproof and drainage optimization schemes, and analyzed the influence of different locations of drainage ditch on the external water pressure of the lining structure. In summary, field scholars mostly use numerical calculation and model test methods to study the drainage process of drainage holes and the variation laws of the seepage field, but few of them have concerned about the influence of the drainage capacity of drainage system on the external water pressure of the lining structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%