Research on the Throwing Technique of High-Pole Hydrangea Champion Team in the 12th Students’ Games of Guangxi

Abstract

By using the methods of literature, mathematical analysis, and comparative analysis, this study expounds the origin and development history of the culture of Hydrangea and the movement of throwing Hydrangea, studies the representative technical theory of high-pole throwing Hydrangea, and makes a comparative analysis with the angle, speed, and other technical movements of throwing Hydrangea in teaching and training, as well as the trajectory data of the arc top height, circle range, and landing point of the parabola of Hydrangea. This study discusses the technical problems existing in the high shot Hydrangea competition of the two students Games in Guangxi. The research shows that projection technology is the foundation and core element of the survival and development of high-pole throwing Hydrangea; the existing projection technology has a certain positive effect on teaching, but it has shortcomings for high-level training and competition. The research shows that throwing technology is the foundation and core element of the survival and development of high-pole throwing Hydrangea; the existing throwing technology has a certain positive effect on teaching, but it has shortcomings for high-level training and competition. The best shooting angle is 640 ≤ α ≤ 720 , and the speed is 13.04 m / s ≤ v 0 ≤ 13.70 m / s , which is a range of numerical matching between the two; the core problem of shooting technology is to shorten the shooting cycle and running distance through the cooperation of the best shooting angle and speed, so as to lay the foundation for improving the hit rate per unit time. Suggestions. Build national sports culture, improve the technical level, and promote the development of national sports to a higher level.

Retracted: Research on the Throwing Technique of High‐Pole Hydrangea Champion Team in the 12th Students’ Games of Guangxi

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…Tis article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. Tis investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”