Rethinking Orphanages for the 21st Century 1999
DOI: 10.4135/9781452232904.n8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the Psychological Effects of Orphanage Care: A Critical Review

Abstract: This electronic copy of this chapter is produced by permission of Sage Publications, Inc. that will publish it as a part of a book on Rethinking Orphanages for the 21st Century edited by Richard B. McKenzie. All rights are reserved by the publisher, and no copies of any part of the material are to be made in any form, whether in hard copy or electronic form, without the express written permission of the publisher.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors identified limitations of the studies: there are insufficient follow-up data comparing developmental indices of African institutionalized orphans with family fostered or adopted children (Zimmerman 2005); most of the existing data are not adjusted for the child's age at time of placement and his experiences prior to institutionalization, which may influence the child's behavioral adaptabilities (McCall 1999). Zimmerman (2005) insists on the necessity of saving many highly vulnerable children and advocates for realistic, practical and immediately feasible solutions, which include orphanages that may play an important role in alleviating most of the problems African orphans and communities are facing.…”
Section: Contextualization Of the Institutional Care In Africamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some authors identified limitations of the studies: there are insufficient follow-up data comparing developmental indices of African institutionalized orphans with family fostered or adopted children (Zimmerman 2005); most of the existing data are not adjusted for the child's age at time of placement and his experiences prior to institutionalization, which may influence the child's behavioral adaptabilities (McCall 1999). Zimmerman (2005) insists on the necessity of saving many highly vulnerable children and advocates for realistic, practical and immediately feasible solutions, which include orphanages that may play an important role in alleviating most of the problems African orphans and communities are facing.…”
Section: Contextualization Of the Institutional Care In Africamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…McCall, 1999) point out a variety of potential confounds that characterize children who are given up to orphanages that may explain some or all of the delayed development observed in children in residence and perhaps the higher frequencies of persisting extreme behavior in such children after adoption. For example, children whose parents relinquish custody of their children to orphanages may come from a different gene pool and such children may have high rates of difficult perinatal circumstances, both of which may predispose them toward delayed development and persistent behavioral problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 The reasons for these deficits are unknown, although delayed growth and developmental milestones have been reported among children who were adopted from orphanages, [3][4][5][6][7]9,23,24 and the adverse effects of orphanage life on child development have been described comprehensively. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Among orphans in Iraqi Kurdistan, behavioral problems increased in children who resided in orphanages compared with those who were placed in foster care. 33 In the present study, it was surprising to identify delayed growth and development among children who resided in foster care.…”
Section: E714mentioning
confidence: 99%