2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-12532-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the nonlinear dynamic relationship between FDI and CO2 emissions in the “One Belt, One Road” countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the inflows of FDI at the 25th quantile distributions of CO 2 emissions enhanced environmental quality. These shreds of evidence connote heterogeneous effects of FDI on environmental quality in Brazil, hence corroborating the positions of Lateef et al (2021) in the case of SAARC countries and Gong et al (2021) in the case of One Belt–One Road countries. On account of this mixed evidence and not forgetting the potential growth benefits of FDI in developing economies, policies should be streamlined to ensure that the inflow of FDI remains within the quantile (25th) where it can effectively restrain pollution and guarantee a cleaner environment for Brazilians or where the pollution halo (a blessing on the environment) is assured.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the inflows of FDI at the 25th quantile distributions of CO 2 emissions enhanced environmental quality. These shreds of evidence connote heterogeneous effects of FDI on environmental quality in Brazil, hence corroborating the positions of Lateef et al (2021) in the case of SAARC countries and Gong et al (2021) in the case of One Belt–One Road countries. On account of this mixed evidence and not forgetting the potential growth benefits of FDI in developing economies, policies should be streamlined to ensure that the inflow of FDI remains within the quantile (25th) where it can effectively restrain pollution and guarantee a cleaner environment for Brazilians or where the pollution halo (a blessing on the environment) is assured.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As highlighted earlier, there is still a lack of consensus among environmental scholars concerning the dynamics of FDI and environmental health. The extreme position maintained that the relationship between the two variables was unexplainable (Gong et al, 2021). In all cases, we envisaged that these existing studies have several shortcomings that may have heightened the ambiguities in their submissions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the impact of FDI on environmental pollution, studies by (Li et al, 2019), (Gong et al, 2021), (Abdo et al, 2020), (Wang et al, 2020) (Raihan, 2023)… all support the "pollution paradise" hypothesis when arguing that FDI is one of the causes of environmental quality deterioration in the host country. Most recently, Gong et al (2021) used data from countries along the "One Belt, One Road" as the sample and discovered that developing countries such as South Africa and Malaysia are still "polluted paradise."…”
Section: Previous Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Regarding the impact of FDI on environmental pollution, studies by (Li et al, 2019), (Gong et al, 2021), (Abdo et al, 2020), (Wang et al, 2020) (Raihan, 2023)… all support the "pollution paradise" hypothesis when arguing that FDI is one of the causes of environmental quality deterioration in the host country. Most recently, Gong et al (2021) used data from countries along the "One Belt, One Road" as the sample and discovered that developing countries such as South Africa and Malaysia are still "polluted paradise." Qamruzzaman et al (2019) used an interprovincial panel to analyze the impact of foreign trade and FDI on the transfer of pollution intensive industries and pointed out that the more FDI was attracted by China's provincial administrative regions, the more significant the transfer of pollution-intensive industries; thus, China is still a "pollution paradise" for FDI.…”
Section: Previous Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Countries such as China, India and South Africa exhibit a nonlinear correlation between FDI and CO 2 emissions. FDI and CO 2 emissions in China are moving in tandem, and this suggests a structural breach in the underlying framework (Ahmad et al, 2023; Gong et al, 2021). Increased agricultural productivity reduces poverty, improves food security, and encourages economic growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%