2006
DOI: 10.1080/00131880600732272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
34
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Anderson and Speck, in team teaching a dialogic learning environment emerges in which multiple perspectives are supported and respected. In a study of Grade 8 mathematics, Jang (2006) defined team teaching as involving, "two or more professors whose primary concern is the sharing of teaching experiences in the classroom, and co-generative dialoging with each other" (p. 177). These practices are similar to Roth and Tobin's (2005) description of coteaching indicating that contemporary team teaching and coteaching share values about teaching that might not be the values of tag teaching.…”
Section: Research Literature On Coteachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Anderson and Speck, in team teaching a dialogic learning environment emerges in which multiple perspectives are supported and respected. In a study of Grade 8 mathematics, Jang (2006) defined team teaching as involving, "two or more professors whose primary concern is the sharing of teaching experiences in the classroom, and co-generative dialoging with each other" (p. 177). These practices are similar to Roth and Tobin's (2005) description of coteaching indicating that contemporary team teaching and coteaching share values about teaching that might not be the values of tag teaching.…”
Section: Research Literature On Coteachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В качестве важного фактора снова и снова об-наруживается общее планирование и подведение итогов как необходимые условия для успешного преподавания в команде [10; 11; 24; 27; 40; 43]. Это требует поддержки школьного руководства и администрации [21]. Педагоги, преподающие в команде, должны быть разгружены по времени, чтобы иметь достаточный объем времени для совместного планирования и соответственно возможности совместного обучения и развития [11; 46].…”
Section: школьная успеваемостьunclassified
“…Если учащиеся фиксируют различные учебные стратегии, в том числе управления классом, и противопоставляют тем самым учителей, это является специфической проблемой [21], которая, однако, решается с помощью профес-сионального сотрудничества и может привести к развитию процесса обучения. Так как учителя, как правило, не раскрывают свои стратегии обучения и не по-лучают по ним обратную связь, только в контексте оценок со стороны руковод-ства школы рефлексия этой двойственной ситуации может быть полезной [21].…”
Section: школьная успеваемостьunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In short, co-teaching is a specific service delivery option that is based on collaboration (Friend & Cook, 2003). According to Jang (2006), team teaching involves two or more teachers whose primary concern is the sharing of teaching experiences in the classroom, and co-generative dialoguing with each other and in doing so, they take collective responsibility for maximizing learning to teach, or becoming better at teaching, while providing enhanced opportunities for their students to learn. It is believed that co-teaching is the reality of the 21st century in business, in industry, in healthcare, in science, in social services and emphatically in education (Friend, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%