Abstract:As a supplement to traditional teaching methods, computer-assisted teaching methods can reflect modern educational concepts, such as creating student-led, teacher-led environments. The goal of college English education is to enable them to communicate effectively in English in their future academic, work, and social interactions, while also developing students’ self-learning skills. Chinese society improves overall cultural competence and adapts to the needs of international communication. Self-directed learni… Show more
This study compared the effect of two face-to-face(F2F) and e-learning education methods on learning, retention, and interest in English language courses. Participants were EFL students studying at Islamic Azad University, for the academic year 2021–2022. A multiple-stage cluster-sampling method was used to select the target participants. Three hundred and twenty EFL learners participated in the study. Students were studying in different majors: accounting, economics, psychology, physical education, law, management, and sociology. Two English tests were applied, a teacher-made VTS (Vocabulary Size Test) and an achievement test (including reading comprehension and grammar questions). Also, a questionnaire was applied to measure the students’ learning interest in F2F and online learning groups. The study found significant differences in learning outcomes related to students’ English learning and vocabulary retention rates. It was seen that the E-learning group that participated in online sessions through the Learning Management Systems (LMS) platform outperformed the F2F group. Another critical finding revealed that learners’ interest in learning English in E-learning classes was higher than in the F2F group. In addition, all constructs of interest (feeling happy, attention, interest, and participation) were higher in scores in the E-learning than in the F2F group. Language teachers, university instructors, educators, syllabus designers, school administrators, and policymakers might rethink their teaching approaches and incorporate E-learning into the curriculum to meet their students’ needs.
This study compared the effect of two face-to-face(F2F) and e-learning education methods on learning, retention, and interest in English language courses. Participants were EFL students studying at Islamic Azad University, for the academic year 2021–2022. A multiple-stage cluster-sampling method was used to select the target participants. Three hundred and twenty EFL learners participated in the study. Students were studying in different majors: accounting, economics, psychology, physical education, law, management, and sociology. Two English tests were applied, a teacher-made VTS (Vocabulary Size Test) and an achievement test (including reading comprehension and grammar questions). Also, a questionnaire was applied to measure the students’ learning interest in F2F and online learning groups. The study found significant differences in learning outcomes related to students’ English learning and vocabulary retention rates. It was seen that the E-learning group that participated in online sessions through the Learning Management Systems (LMS) platform outperformed the F2F group. Another critical finding revealed that learners’ interest in learning English in E-learning classes was higher than in the F2F group. In addition, all constructs of interest (feeling happy, attention, interest, and participation) were higher in scores in the E-learning than in the F2F group. Language teachers, university instructors, educators, syllabus designers, school administrators, and policymakers might rethink their teaching approaches and incorporate E-learning into the curriculum to meet their students’ needs.
With the growing need to nurture students’ independent learning, English language teaching (ELT) practices should reflect student-centered assessment approaches, such as self-assessment, an ultimate goal of higher education. It has been pointed out that to conduct effective self-assessment, students need to be taught systematically, and that is where teachers are expected to step in. Prior to implementing such a change in ELT, it is important to conduct research on English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers’ attitudes toward, and self-efficacy beliefs about, implementing self-assessment to cultivate capable student self-assessors. Although the strong global endorsement of self-assessment over the past two decades has witnessed its classroom implementation in different disciplines, such studies are scant in relation to EFL writing classrooms. To address this gap, the present qualitative research examined five Chinese tertiary EFL writing teachers’ attitudes toward and self-efficacy beliefs about student self-assessment of writing, as well as possible reasons that discourage them from engaging students in self-assessment practices. Data collected from in-depth, semi-structured interviews indicated that self-assessment, a critical element of self-regulated learning, is surprisingly missing from the teachers’ knowledge base and previous practices. Additionally, the findings offer insights into the striking differences in teachers’ understanding of, attitudes toward, and low self-efficacy beliefs about self-assessment of writing. Reasons why teachers choose not to implement self-assessment of writing are also discussed. Findings from this study contribute to a deeper understanding of how EFL teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs are enacted in relation to their classroom assessment practices in order to move forward discussions on the feasibility of implementing self-assessment of writing in tertiary EFL classrooms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.