2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on teacher education programs: Logic model approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kids Together logic model delivered a visual representation of the underlying rationale or logic of the program. It provided the basis for a shared understanding about how Kids Together worked, and informed the design of an evaluation framework, systematic data collection, data analysis and reporting (Helitzer, Hollis et al 2010, Newton, Poon et al 2013). The process of developing the logic model provided a structured way to explore the complexity of what the Kids Together program offered with those involved and enabled the research team to work collaboratively with key stakeholders to document a growing understanding of how the model was being implemented (Baxter, Killoran et al 2010, Yeatman, Quinsey et al 2013.…”
Section: Developing the Kids Together Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Kids Together logic model delivered a visual representation of the underlying rationale or logic of the program. It provided the basis for a shared understanding about how Kids Together worked, and informed the design of an evaluation framework, systematic data collection, data analysis and reporting (Helitzer, Hollis et al 2010, Newton, Poon et al 2013). The process of developing the logic model provided a structured way to explore the complexity of what the Kids Together program offered with those involved and enabled the research team to work collaboratively with key stakeholders to document a growing understanding of how the model was being implemented (Baxter, Killoran et al 2010, Yeatman, Quinsey et al 2013.…”
Section: Developing the Kids Together Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logic model offered the program developers the opportunity to reflect deeply on the Kids Together approach and discuss why implementation of the planned activities would lead to the stated outcomes (Helitzer, Hollis et al 2010, Ziviani, Darlington et al 2011, Newton, Poon et al 2013. Once finalised the logic model was used to frame the analysis of data and determine which outcomes were achieved during the first year of implementation.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Program Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde la perspectiva de la evaluación, un modelo lógico a ende al desarrollo de los componentes de la evaluación y a la forma en que se armonizan con los obje vos generales del programa y sus teorías subyacentes, ayudando a priorizar y enfocar las cuestiones de interés, asegurando la recogida adecuada de los datos de la evaluación, para, tras su análisis, hacer recomendaciones informadas sobre las mejoras que necesita incorporar el programa (NEWTON et al, 2013;FREEDMAN et al, 2014, p. 81). El modelo lógico es la base para elaborar una secuencia convincente del rendimiento esperado de un programa, diseñado para atender unas necesidades, siendo sus elementos los recursos, las ac vidades, los resultados inmediatos en los benefi ciarios a los que a ende, junto con los resultados en el corto plazo y su impacto, considerando las infl uencias externas relevantes (MCLAUGHLIN;JORDAN, 1999;KAPLAN;GARRET, 2005;FIELDEN et al, 2007).…”
Section: Los Modelos Lógicos Para La Evaluación De Programasunclassified
“…RUFDATA originated from research on developing an approach for initiating novice evaluators into the evaluation planning process (Saunders, 2000). The logic model concept is derived from evaluation practices that seek to identify the interactions of multiple variables among program activities and outcomes (Newton, Poon, Nunes, & Stone, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%