2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9091784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Robust Day-Ahead Dispatch Considering Primary Frequency Response of Wind Turbine

Abstract: With the large-scale integration of renewable energy sources (e.g., wind power), the system inertial response and primary frequency regulation are affected. The virtual synchronous generator technology, which makes it possible for wind power units to adjust the frequency, provides a new way of approaching this problem. In this paper, we set up the related constraints that fit the optimal dispatch framework with a primary reserve representing the primary frequency response between the conventional synchronous g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formulation captures the basic dynamic features of governors and adds a linear ramp rate constraint to the underlying optimization problem. The concept of simplifying dynamic representations of frequency stability has been extended to various other problems, such as Unit Commitment (UC) [45], storage integration [46], wind turbine frequency response [47], stochastic scheduling [48], and inertia and frequency response pricing [49]. However, in the aforementioned coupled reserve and energy formulations, the system dynamics (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation captures the basic dynamic features of governors and adds a linear ramp rate constraint to the underlying optimization problem. The concept of simplifying dynamic representations of frequency stability has been extended to various other problems, such as Unit Commitment (UC) [45], storage integration [46], wind turbine frequency response [47], stochastic scheduling [48], and inertia and frequency response pricing [49]. However, in the aforementioned coupled reserve and energy formulations, the system dynamics (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VI is essential for inertial response in primary control frequency containment process (FCP) to provide dynamic frequency support for the grid with high wind and solar power penetration [28]. Figure 6 illustrates the VI-based inverter is reminiscent of an SG to Traditional frequency regulation process and the response of the power system can be divided into three stages, namely primary, secondary, and tertiary frequency response, which is equivalent to inertial response and governor response, automatic generation control (AGC), and reserve deployment, respectively [27]. VI is essential for inertial response in primary control frequency containment process (FCP) to provide dynamic frequency support for the grid with high wind and solar power penetration [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%