Research on Reward and Punishment Contract Model and Coordination of Green Supply Chain Based on Fairness Preference

Jiang, Mingjun; Chen, Dongyan; Yu, Hui

doi:10.3390/su13168749

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As the leader of an enterprise's senior management team, the CEO Frontiers in Environmental Science frontiersin.org is ultimately responsible for identifying innovation opportunities, obtaining innovation resources, and selecting and implementing innovation strategies (Zhang Z. et al, 2022). The CEO's education level comprehensively reflects their stock of knowledge, innovation awareness, cognitive ability, and social network and capital, which will inevitably have a far-reaching impact on the innovation behavior and performance of enterprises (Jiang et al, 2021). CEOs with high education levels have the following characteristics: first, their ideas are more advanced, and their strategic layout is more forward-looking.…”

Section: Effect Of Ceos' Education On Enterprises' Green Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

CEO educational attainment, green innovation, and enterprise performance: Evidence from China’s heavy-polluting enterprises

Zhang

Gou

et al. 2022

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our study explores how CEOs’ educational attainment affects green innovation at the enterprise level and whether CEO educational attainment and green innovation can improve enterprise performance. To date, few studies have used environmental patents of listed companies to measure green innovation at the micro-level. Furthermore, existing studies have rarely considered the heterogeneity of the enterprise type or social responsibility and institutional intervention. Thus, by using a fixed-effects model, we argue that there is a positive relationship between CEO educational attainment and green innovation. Additionally, CEO education level significantly improves enterprise performance which leads to more sustainable green patent output by influencing green innovation based on data from listed companies in heavily polluting industries in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2018. Moreover, the result is still held after controlling for companies’ fixed effects and using the propensity score matching method (PSM) to eliminate endogenous and sample selection bias. Specifically, we demonstrate the following findings: 1) the positive influence of CEOs’ educational attainment on green innovation behavior is more significant in private enterprises and enterprises with higher social responsibility. 2) Strict environmental legislation can make a positive impact in regions with heavy environmental pollution. 3) Enterprises’ performance and sustainable environmental innovation are promoted by the positive mechanism. Our results not only enrich the literature on the relationship between education and innovation in terms of heterogeneity but also have significance in determining how to reduce pollution from the perspective of environmental governance and enterprise management.

show abstract

Section: Effect Of Ceos' Education On Enterprises' Green Innovationmentioning

confidence: 99%

CEO educational attainment, green innovation, and enterprise performance: Evidence from China’s heavy-polluting enterprises

Zhang

Gou

et al. 2022

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this section, the low-carbon supply chain as a whole makes decisions, the profit function of the overall supply chain be obtained as shown in formula (23), the centralized decision model will be signed by superscript c in this section.…”

Section: Centralized Decision Model After Low-carbon Investmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on Decision-making and Coordination Mechanism of Low-carbon Supply Chain Led by Retailers under Information Asymmetry

2023

JGEBF

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whether in the case of information symmetry or information asymmetry, cost sharing is a way to promote enterprises of the low-carbon supply chain to actively cooperate and coordinate, and the behavior preference of decision-makers will affect the process. On the basis of consumers' low-carbon preference, this paper discusses cooperation strategies of the supply chain led by retailers after low-carbon investment. We show how different cost sharing contracts influence wholesale price, retail price, the optimal profit and the sharing proportion of low-carbon costs based on the different information sharing models. The results show that low-carbon investment can promote an increase in all enterprises' profits in the supply chain, but the results under the decentralized decision are not better than those under the centralized decision. Therefore, this study designs low-carbon costs sharing contracts to coordinate decisions. When the cost sharing proportion is within a reasonable range, the single-cost sharing contract can improve the profit of the supply chain. However, the profit of the entire supply chain is still lower than that under the centralized decision, which fails to achieve the perfect coordination of the low-carbon supply chain. When retailers misstate low-carbon costs and dominate the supply chain, they will prefer to understate the low-carbon promotion cost to maximize their profits. Through further calculation, when enterprises use innovation-promotion costs sharing contracts, we can find that the results under the centralized decision are equal to those under the decentralized decision. Therefore, the innovation-promotion costs sharing contract can realize the perfect coordination of the low-carbon supply chain and promote the cooperative decision-making of upstream and downstream enterprises.

show abstract

“…Li et al [ 57 ] studied the equilibrium results and coordination methods of the green supply chain, and constructed different game models of pricing strategy, profit coordination and information mode. Jiang et al [ 58 ] investigated the manufacturer’s fairness preference, based on the product green level provided by suppliers as the reference standard, built a reward and penalty contract model based on the product green level, and analyzed the influence of manufacturer’s fairness preference on the product green level, price, manufacturer’s profit, supplier’s power and overall profit. Song et al [ 59 ] studied the coordination of a three-level green fresh supply chain and constructed a joint contract of revenue and cost-sharing and a cross-joint contract model of cost and revenue sharing to improve the sustainable performance of the green supply chain.Wang et al [ 60 ] established a supply chain model consisting of an e-commerce platform and a manufacturer, adopting Nash transaction contracts and Rubinstein negotiation contracts to mitigate benefit conflicts.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

R&D mode and coordination of green products in sustainable supply chain considering power structures

Liu,

Feng

2023

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Green product R&D has a significant impact on the sustainable development of the economy and environment, and green product R&D can be carried out by manufacturers, retailers, third-party companies, and enterprise alliances. The decision-making order in the supply chain depends on the power structures, which can affect the choice of the supply chain decision-making. To study the optimal choice of green product R&D mode in different power structures and the influence of power structure on product price, market demand, green level, and enterprise profits, This paper compares five modes including green product R&D by manufacturers, green product R&D by retailers, green product R&D outsourced by manufacturers to third-party companies, green product R&D outsourced by retailers to third-party companies and green product R&D by manufacturers and retailers in the three power structures of manufacturers as core enterprises, retailers as core enterprises, and equal power between manufacturers and retailers to study the selection strategy of green product R&D modes in the sustainable supply chain. The conclusion provides a strategic reference for the selection of green product R&D mode in different power structures. The findings indicate that when manufacturers are core enterprises, retailers’ green product R&D is better than that of manufacturers. When retailers are core enterprises, manufacturers’ green product R&D is better than that of retailers. In the same power structure, manufacturers’ green product R&D is better than outsourcing to third-party companies, retailers’ green product R&D is better than outsourcing to third-party companies, and manufacturers and retailers jointly conduct green product R&D better than manufacturers or retailers alone. When manufacturers and retailers have equal power, the market demand and the product green level are the highest, and the retail price is the lowest. When manufacturers are core enterprises, manufacturers’ profits are the highest. When retailers are core enterprises, retailers’ profits are the highest. Finally, a two-part pricing contract is used to coordinate the optimal selection strategies.

show abstract

Research on Reward and Punishment Contract Model and Coordination of Green Supply Chain Based on Fairness Preference

Cited by 9 publications

References 29 publications

CEO educational attainment, green innovation, and enterprise performance: Evidence from China’s heavy-polluting enterprises

CEO educational attainment, green innovation, and enterprise performance: Evidence from China’s heavy-polluting enterprises

Research on Decision-making and Coordination Mechanism of Low-carbon Supply Chain Led by Retailers under Information Asymmetry

R&D mode and coordination of green products in sustainable supply chain considering power structures

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About