Research on Performance Measurement and Simulation of Civil Air Defense PPP Projects Using System Dynamics

Tang, Lingyi; Yue, Yibo; Xiahou, Xiaer; Tang, Shi Bin

doi:10.3846/jcem.2021.14919

Cited by 14 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

Section: Model Development and Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The structure of the SD model mainly contains a causal loop diagram and stock-flow diagram. The causal loop diagram embodies the systematic visualized framework, reflects the main feedback mechanisms and serves as a preliminary sketch for hypotheses and model simplification (Mak et al, 2019;Tang et al, 2021). Based on a review of the related literature, this paper divides the model of BIM implementation in the construction phase into four subsystems, which are technical subsystem, organizational subsystem, economic…”

Section: Development Of Sd Model For Assessing the Level Of The Bim I...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A system dynamic model for assessing the level of BIM implementation in construction phase: a China case study

Zuo

Chang

et al. 2021

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeBuilding information modeling (BIM) is recognized as one of the technologies to upgrade the informatization level of the architecture engineering and construction (AEC) industry. However, the level of BIM implementation in the construction phase lags behind other phases of the project. Assessing the level of BIM implementation in the construction phase from a system dynamics (SD) perspective can comprehensively understand the interrelationship of factors in the BIM implementation system, thereby developing effective strategies to enhance BIM implementation during the construction phase. This study aims to develop a model to investigate the level of BIM implementation in the construction phase.Design/methodology/approachAn SD model which covered technical subsystem, organizational subsystem, economic subsystem and environmental subsystem was developed based on questionnaire survey data and literature review. Data from China were used for model validation and simulation.FindingsThe simulation results highlight that, in China, from 2021 to 2035, the ratio of BIM implementation in the construction phase will rise from 48.8% to 83.8%, BIM model quality will be improved from 27.6% to 77.2%. The values for variables “BIM platform”, “organizational structure of BIM” and “workflow of BIM” at 2035 will reach 65.6%, 72.9% and 72.8%, respectively. And the total benefits will reach 336.5 billion yuan in 2035. Furthermore, the findings reveal five factors to effectively promote the level of BIM implementation in the construction phase, including: policy support, number of BIM standards, owners demand for BIM, investment in BIM and strategic support for BIM.Originality/valueThis study provides beneficial insights to effectively enhance the implementation level of BIM in the construction phase. Meanwhile, the model developed in this study can be used to dynamically and quantitatively assess the changes in the level of BIM implementation caused by a measure.

show abstract

Section: Model Development and Formulationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Development Of Sd Model For Assessing the Level Of The Bim I...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A system dynamic model for assessing the level of BIM implementation in construction phase: a China case study

Zuo

Chang

et al. 2021

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Evolutionary games are still divided on the concept of equilibrium strategy, and the relationship between evolutionary equilibrium and equilibrium strategy needs to be further analyzed and defined in depth in the context of environmental mass events.System Dynamics is summarized on the basis of game theory, in order to adapt to the management needs of modern social systems and developed. In the mid-1950s, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Professor J. W. Forrester founded the theory of system dynamics [28] , and then system dynamics in national defense [29], social science [30], medicine [31], ecology [32] and other fields have been widely studied and disseminated.…”

Section: Environmental Issues and Group Gamingmentioning

confidence: 99%

A system dynamics-based model for the evolution of environmental group events

Qi,

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Based on the system dynamics theory, this paper establishes an environmental mass event evolution model and explores the evolution law of mass events caused by environmental problems. From a methodological point of view, the mixed-strategy evolutionary game principle and dynamic punishment measures are combined, and simulation analysis is carried out by Anylogic software, and the results show that there is no stable evolutionary equilibrium solution for the two sides of the game in the traditional asymmetric mixed-strategy game model, and after adjusting the game payoff matrix and incorporating the dynamic punishment strategy, stable evolutionary equilibrium solutions appear in the evolutionary game model, and the system begins to tend to be stabilized. The process and conclusions of the simulation experiment provide methodological reference and theoretical support for the analysis of the evolution of environmental mass events.

show abstract

“…Tang L, et al [21] argued that it is necessary to comprehensively consider the project performance under different states to conduct scientific performance measurement. The author emphasis the research on the process of construction, operation, and handover of Civil Air Defense PPP projects.…”

Section: Conceptual -Theoretical Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance Measurement and Evaluation of Public-Private Partnerships: A Systematic Literature Review

JPR¹

2022

EOIJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The theme regarding the procurement models implementation, under a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) regime has been widely discussed in the last decade, with a general lack of consensus regarding the forms of measuring and evaluating the outcome performance during their life cycle. The main objective of this paper is to contribute to a greater understanding, regarding the PPP forms of performance measurement and evaluation, answering the research question: How to measure and evaluate performance in PPP model? Simultaneously, by identifying both empirical studies, which enable performance measurement as well as theoretical papers, which point new paths for a correct evaluation of this type of procurement model (contracting). To answer the research question and achieve the proposed objectives, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was performed, having as data a set of 64 articles, published in specialized journals, available on the electronic platform “Web of Science”. The results allowed classifying the PPP models measurement and evaluation of the performance in three main clusters: • Evaluation Systems and Frameworks • Performance Measurement (KPIs) and • Conceptual - Theoretical Analysis Through this alignment, it becomes evident that there is no agreement among academics and researchers as to the most effective way to measure and evaluate the PPP model performance. This disagreement results from the application of different evaluation methods to PPP projects with different characteristics and the distinctive nature/objectives of the procurement projects, which leads to the uncertainty regarding the transversal applicability of evaluation models to all PPP projects. Finally, we propose as future investigation, the elaboration of a matrix, disaggregating the PPP model in its various typologies and by contracting scope, applying, for each case, the various models and frameworks proposed in the literature. This matrix could validate whether it will, in fact, be possible to associate a given measurement and evaluation model to a specific PPP typology vs. scope, in a consistent and transversal way. It is also proposed to apply efforts towards a conclusion regarding the VfM (Value for Money) indicator and its relation to the PPP outcome performance. Finally, it is proposed to accommodate conceptual studies to reach a contractual framework, which might mitigate the negative effects of the written contracts and enhance the positive impacts.

show abstract

Research on Performance Measurement and Simulation of Civil Air Defense PPP Projects Using System Dynamics

Cited by 14 publications

References 20 publications

A system dynamic model for assessing the level of BIM implementation in construction phase: a China case study

A system dynamic model for assessing the level of BIM implementation in construction phase: a China case study

A system dynamics-based model for the evolution of environmental group events

Performance Measurement and Evaluation of Public-Private Partnerships: A Systematic Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About