2017 IEEE Second International Conference on Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/dsc.2017.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Online Learning of Radar Emitter Recognition Based on Hull Vector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 3, test accuracies of SVM, NN and DT were close to each other, which varied in the range 94.1% to 95.5%. In [4–6], SVM achieved quite good performance on small datasets. However, in our case of big data, it was not the case.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Table 3, test accuracies of SVM, NN and DT were close to each other, which varied in the range 94.1% to 95.5%. In [4–6], SVM achieved quite good performance on small datasets. However, in our case of big data, it was not the case.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jordanov et al [4] utilised SVM model in REC to handle incomplete samples. Zhu et al [5] realised an online learning SVM model based on hull vector, which improved SVM's ability to learn new knowledge. Xu et al [6] designed a novel method for estimating kernels of SVM, and it was used to choose the best kernel for different REC tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SVM classifier does not good at learning new knowledge in real-time. Hull vector and Parzen window density estimation [195] were reported for online learning of radar emitter recognition.…”
Section: B Traditional Machine Learning In Rrscrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the supplied features, these studies mainly concentrate on the time domain features [ 10 , 12 , 13 ], transformed domain features [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] and statistics features [ 15 ]. From the aspect of the recognition method, the studies can be divided into two groups: classifiers based on multi-thresholds and multi-regulations [ 10 , 12 ], and classifiers based on learning algorithms [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. However, it is one-sided to divide the radar emitter recognition only discussing the recognition features or recognition methods separately, because the recognition features are related to the recognition methods, and the length, dimension, structure and format of the features have decided the optimal recognition methods, so it is a good idea for radar emitter recognition method categories to be defined by combining the features and methods together as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%