Research on Influencing Factors of Clinical Efficacy of Meniscus Resection Based on Logistic Regression Analysis

Abstract

In order to solve the factors affecting the clinical efficacy of meniscus resection, a method based on logistic regression analysis is proposed. From May 2019 to May 2020, 60 patients with discoid meniscus who underwent arthroscopic surgery in the Joint Department of the Second Hospital of a certain city were selected as the research objects; the surgical methods are divided into partial meniscus excision and plasty and total meniscus resection. The Lysholm function score was used to evaluate the clinical efficacy of arthroscopic surgery for discoid meniscus injuries before and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and postoperative application of Ikeuchi score and Tegner exercise ability score to assess age, gender, body mass index (BMI), duration of symptoms, and the influence of meniscus injury types and surgical methods on the efficacy of arthroscopic surgery for discoid meniscus injuries. Experimental results show that Ikeuchi’s assessment of the excellent and good rate of arthroscopic knee joints was significantly higher than that of the control group, the incidence of postoperative pain was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). Postoperative pain and premature weight-bearing of discoid meniscus injury of knee joint, factors such as noncold compress after operation, articular cartilage damage, age, and time from onset to operation are closely related; the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). Postoperative evaluation according to Ikeuchi score: excellent in 38 cases, good in 14 cases, 8 cases were poor, and the excellent and good rate was 86.7%. The patient’s age, type of meniscus tear, and duration of symptoms have a certain impact on the postoperative clinical efficacy of discoid meniscus injury; BMI and surgical methods have no significant impact. Logistic regression analysis results show that postoperative pain and premature weight-bearing of discoid meniscus injury of the knee joint, no cold compress after operation, accompanied by articular cartilage damage, age, and factors such as onset to operation time are closely related; the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). It proves that arthroscopic surgery for discoid meniscus injury has the advantages of less damage and faster recovery, it is the first choice for the treatment of discoid meniscus injury, and the postoperative effect is significant in young patients and those with short duration of symptoms; mixed tears have a greater impact on the postoperative recovery of patients with discoid meniscus injury; therefore, patients with discoid meniscus injury should undergo surgery as soon as possible and perform active rehabilitation exercises after the operation.

Therapeutic effect of two methods on avulsion fracture of tibial insertion of anterior cruciate ligament

“…Knee joint function evaluation using Lysholm score[ 4 ], Lysholm score scale, claudication total score of 5 points, support total score of 5 points, lock total score of 15 points, instability total score of 25 points, swelling total score of 10 points, upstairs total score of 10 points, squat total score of 5 points, pain total score of 25 points, were scored according to the scale grading standard.…”

Retracted: Research on Influencing Factors of Clinical Efficacy of Meniscus Resection Based on Logistic Regression Analysis

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”