2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation Through Technology (EITT) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/eitt.2015.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Micro-lecture Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research has reference value, but the content is a knowledge sharing in an open innovation community, which is different from the research content of this paper. Xia et al (2014) investigated the open innovation community networks by analyzing the participants of the open innovation community network, and establishing the evaluation index system network by studying collaborative cooperation and integration of elements among innovation subjects. This study is mainly aimed at improving innovation in an open innovation community network, which is also different from the research content of this paper.…”
Section: Relevant Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research has reference value, but the content is a knowledge sharing in an open innovation community, which is different from the research content of this paper. Xia et al (2014) investigated the open innovation community networks by analyzing the participants of the open innovation community network, and establishing the evaluation index system network by studying collaborative cooperation and integration of elements among innovation subjects. This study is mainly aimed at improving innovation in an open innovation community network, which is also different from the research content of this paper.…”
Section: Relevant Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision-making procedure of LP can be illustrated with an analytic hierarchy process (Saaty & Vargas, 2001;Xia & Wang, 2015). That is, referring to classical instructional design theory (Gagné, Wager, Golas, & Keller, 2005;Kemp, 1971;Kemp, Morrison, & Ross, 1998;Dick, Carey, & Carey, 1996), lesson planning theories (Jefferies, 1966;Karges-Bone, 2000;Savage, 2015), and other previous research (He, Liu, Zheng, & Jia, 2016), IDC is considered a hierarchical system including multiple abilities: Textbook and Related Curriculum Material Analyzing (TA), Learner Analyzing (LA), Objective Making (OM), Content Selecting (CS), Strategies, Resources and Media Selecting (SRMS), Events Arranging (EA) and Reflecting and Feedback and Teaching Practice and Evaluation/Improvement (RFTEI).…”
Section: The Analytic Hierarchy System Of Idcmentioning
confidence: 99%