Research on Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation of Resource Allocation Efficiency of Technology Innovation in the Aerospace Industry

Abstract

From the perspective of input and output, this paper constructs an evaluation index system for the status quo of technology innovation resource allocation in China’s aerospace industry. Taking the industrial panel data of 20 provincial regions from 2007 to 2016 in China as samples, this paper uses the stochastic frontier method, which is improved by the projection pursuit model based on accelerated genetic algorithm, to analyze the factors influencing the allocation efficiency of technology innovation resource in the aerospace industry and then make a static evaluation for the current situation. In addition, based on the perspective of velocity characteristics, this study uses the dynamic comprehensive evaluation model to evaluate the resource allocation of technology innovation in the aerospace industry. The empirical research shows that the resource allocation efficiency of technology innovation in the aerospace industry is generally at the lower middle level, indicating an unbalanced trend of “reverse” allocation with the level of regional economic development. It is also found that the efficiency improvement effect in recent years is not obvious. At last, based on the study’s findings, some countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to improve the current situation.

Optimization Analysis for Innovative Inputs under the Objective Discrepancy between Government and Enterprise

“…Although the overall efciency of the innovation resources increased, the scale efciency was relatively low [28]. For example, the empirical research shows that the efciency of innovation resource allocation in the aerospace industry is generally at the lower middle level, and the efciency improvement in recent years is not obvious [29]. One reason for the low efciency is the mismatched allocation, which can lower aggregate total factor productivity (TFP) [30].…”

Innovation Capacity of City Administrations: A Best Practices Approach

“…Other metrics focus on innovation processes dedicated to certain purposes, such as sustainability (Pan et al, 2020) or internationalization (Enjolras et al, 2020), or to specific sectors like aeronautics (Dongri et al, 2020), surgery (Bilbro et al, 2020), or tourism (Vera et al, 2019). The evaluation scales are plural and consequently the objectives and outcomes of the metrics are numerous.…”

Synergetic Development Measure of Airport Groups Composite System and Its Influencing Factors Analysis: Some Evidence from China

“…In comprehensive evaluation, the speed of synergy change is very important [13]. Combining the composite system synergy model with the dynamic comprehensive evaluation model can better carry out the comprehensive evaluation from both static and dynamic perspectives [20][21][22]. For example, Dongri et al analyzed the factors afecting the efciency of resource allocation for technological innovation in the aerospace industry.…”

“…For example, Dongri et al analyzed the factors afecting the efciency of resource allocation for technological innovation in the aerospace industry. Ten, a dynamic comprehensive evaluation model is used to evaluate the resource allocation based on speed characteristics' perspective [20].…”