2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6628021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Differential Brain Networks before and after WM Training under Different Frequency Band Oscillations

Abstract: Previous studies have shown that different frequency band oscillations are associated with cognitive processing such as working memory (WM). Electroencephalogram (EEG) coherence and graph theory can be used to measure functional connections between different brain regions and information interaction between different clusters of neurons. At the same time, it was found that better cognitive performance of individuals indicated stronger small-world characteristics of resting-state WM networks. However, little is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resting state usually refers to an eyes-closed (EC) and/or eyes-open (EO) state in EEG, which is a measure of the background or tonic level of brain activity [15] [55]. In the current study, it was further investigated the alteration of brain functional networks from EC to EO states in OCD patients, which was rarely reported in previous studies with EEG.…”
Section: Difference Of Brain Functional Network Between Ec and Eo Sta...mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resting state usually refers to an eyes-closed (EC) and/or eyes-open (EO) state in EEG, which is a measure of the background or tonic level of brain activity [15] [55]. In the current study, it was further investigated the alteration of brain functional networks from EC to EO states in OCD patients, which was rarely reported in previous studies with EEG.…”
Section: Difference Of Brain Functional Network Between Ec and Eo Sta...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…After eliminating the influence of various artifacts, the 30s artifact-free EEG data (15000 sample points) were selected from each participant and divided into five segments. Each segment of the EEGs was decomposed into the conventional EEG frequency bands, including theta (4-7 Hz), alpha (8)(9)(10)(11)(12), beta (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), and gamma (31-48 Hz) bands for calculating PLVs. To further improve the reliability of the current results, we took the average PLV of the five segments in each frequency band and applied them in the subsequent analysis of brain functional networks.…”
Section: B Eeg Acquisition and Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sparsity method was used to keep the connections whose connection strength was greater than the threshold as valid connections. It could ensure that the evaluation of network features would not be biased by different numbers of connections and possible low-weight false connections [ 33 , 34 ]. In this study, weighted networks, in which the values of the edges in the weighted network are the PLI values, were constructed with a sparsity of 15–30% and an increment of 1% for each step.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the general avoidance response rats, the days to reach the standard, the training number, the correct response time and the error reaction number in simulated stimulus avoidance response rats were significantly reduced, but the correct response rate was significantly increased (all P<0.01); the θ-γ neural oscillations PAC in the hippocampal CA3 region in the simulated stimulus avoidance response rats (3)(4)(5)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(5)(6)(7)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(54)(55)(56)(57)(58) were significantly higher than that in the general avoidance response rats (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, the protein expressions of NR2B and PSD-95 in hippocampal tissues were significantly increased (both P<0.05) in simulated stimulus avoidance response rats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%