2023
DOI: 10.3390/s23198301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Development 3D Ground Penetrating Radar Acquisition and Control Technology for Road Underground Diseases with Dual-Band Antenna Arrays

Liang Fang,
Feng Yang,
Maoxuan Xu
et al.

Abstract: This paper describes the development of a new 3D ground-penetrating radar (GPR) acquisition and control technology for road underground diseases with dual-band antenna arrays. The 3D GPR system can be mounted on a vehicle-loading device and used by vehicles to detect road underground diseases at regular speeds. Compared with existing 3D GPR systems, this new type of 3D GPR has the following design features: it has dual-band antenna arrays, including a 16-channel 400 MHz antenna array and an 8-channel 200 MHz a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between antennas in GPR studies highlights a trade-off between resolution and penetration depth. The high-frequency antenna offers superior resolution, capable of detecting features as small as 2 cm, but its penetration depth is limited to 0.4 m. However, the low-frequency antenna provides a lower resolution but can penetrate up to 4.5 m, making it more suitable for deeper subsurface investigations [56,58,[82][83][84][85][86]. The choice of antenna is closely related to the resolution of a specific conservation problem as accurately as possible: the washing of paint, which is directly linked to water accumulated in the first centimeters from the basal surface of the Ceiling.…”
Section: Gpr Of Alt1 Control Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison between antennas in GPR studies highlights a trade-off between resolution and penetration depth. The high-frequency antenna offers superior resolution, capable of detecting features as small as 2 cm, but its penetration depth is limited to 0.4 m. However, the low-frequency antenna provides a lower resolution but can penetrate up to 4.5 m, making it more suitable for deeper subsurface investigations [56,58,[82][83][84][85][86]. The choice of antenna is closely related to the resolution of a specific conservation problem as accurately as possible: the washing of paint, which is directly linked to water accumulated in the first centimeters from the basal surface of the Ceiling.…”
Section: Gpr Of Alt1 Control Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, addressing deeper accumulations indirectly requires an antenna with greater penetration. Ultimately, the objective is to respond to a conservation need, balancing the requirement for resolution against the need for depth penetration to ensure optimal results in subsurface imaging and detection applications [56,58,[82][83][84][85][86]. The digital processing of time-domain GPR data generally relies on the amplitude values of the signal for interpretation.…”
Section: Gpr Of Alt1 Control Areamentioning
confidence: 99%