2014
DOI: 10.1166/sl.2014.3155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Determination Method of Starch, Protein and Total Flavonoids Content in Buckwheat by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The NIR prediction model for sucrose content in peanut kernels built by Telly et al [25], using 72 peanut resources with edible oil, showed that the coefficient of determination of the optimal model was only 0.822, while Bian et al [26] expanded the number of modeling samples to 119 and the coefficient of determination of the optimal peanut sucrose prediction model increased to 0.898. Wang et al [27] used 40 samples to build the near-infrared model for buckwheat grain protein and total flavonoids, but the prediction value of the built model for protein and flavonoids was not ideal, which might be related to the small sample size. Guo et al [28] used 217 buckwheat samples to build a prediction model for grain protein and found that the coefficient of determination of the prediction model was 0.9481 and the root mean square of the cross-validation was 0.68.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NIR prediction model for sucrose content in peanut kernels built by Telly et al [25], using 72 peanut resources with edible oil, showed that the coefficient of determination of the optimal model was only 0.822, while Bian et al [26] expanded the number of modeling samples to 119 and the coefficient of determination of the optimal peanut sucrose prediction model increased to 0.898. Wang et al [27] used 40 samples to build the near-infrared model for buckwheat grain protein and total flavonoids, but the prediction value of the built model for protein and flavonoids was not ideal, which might be related to the small sample size. Guo et al [28] used 217 buckwheat samples to build a prediction model for grain protein and found that the coefficient of determination of the prediction model was 0.9481 and the root mean square of the cross-validation was 0.68.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the tartary buckwheat was mature, the grains were harvested and dried indoors for seven days, so that the water content of all samples was basically at the same level. Then, the grains were shelled, crushed, and screened through a 0.2 mm sieve (Zhangxing Sieve, Shaoxing, China), so that all the crushed samples remained the same thickness [ 24 ]. The sieved samples were used to measure hyperspectral reflectance, total flavonoids, and total phenols content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers also used spectral technology to study the flavonoids content in buckwheat grains. For example, Wang et al [ 24 ] used near-infrared spectroscopy to monitor the content of total flavonoids in buckwheat grains and obtained a model with high accuracy, whose validation R 2 reached 0.967. Rutin is a kind of flavonoid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of total flavonoids in tea trees is determined by factors such as tea tree variety, ecological environment, soil condition, and management methods. Wang et al [15] employed a combination of principal component analysis (PCA) and artificial neural networks (ANN) to establish prediction models for buckwheat starch, protein, and total flavonoids content, respectively. The results revealed low accuracy in predicting protein and total flavonoids content, which may be due to the limited sample size, and no appropriate methods were applied to address this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%