Proceedings of the 31st International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS+ 201 2018
DOI: 10.33012/2018.15995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on Dependency of Carrier Phase Biases on Correlator Spacing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current day CODE DCB products are used as a reference. Five correlator spacings (0.6 to 1.0) are used to calculate GNSS observations since the observations are not accurate enough when the correlator spacing is less than 0.6 chips [ 21 , 28 ]. Observations calculated from the same spacing for all satellites are used as an independent receiver.…”
Section: Experiment Results Comparison and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current day CODE DCB products are used as a reference. Five correlator spacings (0.6 to 1.0) are used to calculate GNSS observations since the observations are not accurate enough when the correlator spacing is less than 0.6 chips [ 21 , 28 ]. Observations calculated from the same spacing for all satellites are used as an independent receiver.…”
Section: Experiment Results Comparison and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… and are the satellite hardware-induced code bias and receiver hardware-induced code bias, respectively, and is the satellite and receiver code thermal noise. References [ 21 , 28 ] proved that the carrier phase and pseudorange observations measured by different correlator spacings are independent and can be used to classify and estimate satellite biases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation is a statistical process that is based on the average and probabilities [26,27]. Different correlator spacings showed different performance for correlating the two signals and induced different biases [28][29][30][31]. The research in [22,26,28] proved that the receiver biases could not be eliminated by the betweensatellite single-differenced observations for both pseudorange and carrier phase observations by a comparison between the real signal and the simulated signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%