Proceedings of 2012 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Network Technology 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iccsnt.2012.6526220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on absorbing boundary condition in FDTD method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, MoM is a frequency-domain approach that necessitates separate operations for every individual frequency, rendering it unsuitable for the analysis of problems involving broad bandwidths or nonlinearity. In contrast, FDTD handles open-region problems in a more natural manner, and infnite-wave propagation can be modeled efectively by employing absorbing boundary conditions [18]. Moreover, while FDTD demands a denser mesh to deal with the details, its meshing procedure is comparatively uncomplicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, MoM is a frequency-domain approach that necessitates separate operations for every individual frequency, rendering it unsuitable for the analysis of problems involving broad bandwidths or nonlinearity. In contrast, FDTD handles open-region problems in a more natural manner, and infnite-wave propagation can be modeled efectively by employing absorbing boundary conditions [18]. Moreover, while FDTD demands a denser mesh to deal with the details, its meshing procedure is comparatively uncomplicated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%