2019
DOI: 10.3390/sym11060809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on a Tool Wear Monitoring Algorithm Based on Residual Dense Network

Abstract: To accurately and efficiently detect tool wear values during production and processing activities, a new online detection model is proposed called the Residual Dense Network (RDN). The model is created with two main steps: Firstly, the time-domain signals for a cutting tool are obtained (e.g., using acceleration sensors); these signals are processed to denoise and segmented to provide a larger number of uniform samples. This processing helps to improve the robustness of the model. Secondly, a new deep convolut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this part, eight state-of-the-art models, including two machine learning models, random forests (RF), and support vector regression (SVR) [34] and six deep learning model, deep convolution neural network (DCNN) [35], residual dense network (RDN) [36], multiscale convolutional neural network (MSCNN) [37], convolutional long-short-term memory network (CLSTM) [24], deep belief networks (DBN) [38], and multiscale convolutional attention network (MSCAN) [39] are utilized to estimate the RUL for the comparison analysis. For the RF and SVR, features listed in [34] are extracted from all the monitoring data.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this part, eight state-of-the-art models, including two machine learning models, random forests (RF), and support vector regression (SVR) [34] and six deep learning model, deep convolution neural network (DCNN) [35], residual dense network (RDN) [36], multiscale convolutional neural network (MSCNN) [37], convolutional long-short-term memory network (CLSTM) [24], deep belief networks (DBN) [38], and multiscale convolutional attention network (MSCAN) [39] are utilized to estimate the RUL for the comparison analysis. For the RF and SVR, features listed in [34] are extracted from all the monitoring data.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-art Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the remarkable ability of extracting degradation features from monitoring data, CNN-based RUL prediction methods become a research hotspot, especially the multiscale CNN (MSCNN) [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Te architecture of traditional MSCNN with self-attention is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Audible sound signals were used as a sensing approach to detect the cutting tool wear and failure during end milling using the Support Vector Machine (SVM) model. Li, et al [13] presented a deep convolutional neural network by combining the concepts of a recursive residual network and a dense network to perform tool wear monitoring and prediction. Chen, et al [14] integrated a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a bidirectional Long Short-term Memory (BiLSTM) network to monitor the tool wear state during milling.…”
Section: Studies Regarding Tool Wear Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these traditional models still have to face some problems [26][27][28][29]. On the one hand, feature extraction and selection are essential but labor intensive, and require both sufficient domain expertise and rich experience [1,28,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%