2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.10.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research on a feature selection method based on median impact value for modeling in thermal power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More details on TreeExplainer can be found in Lundberg et al (2019a).TreeExplainer is employed in this study to calculate the SHAP values for the XGBoost, RandomForest, and CART models to assess the contribution of hydro-environmental features to the prediction. "Connection weight" (Garson, 1991), Partial derivative (Dimopoulos et al, 1995), or input variable disturbance (Qi et al, 2016) are some more approaches for analyzing the feature sensitivity of neural network models. These approaches are, nevertheless, "local sensitivity analysis" methods, which only assess the impact of one input variable on the outcome.…”
Section: Shap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details on TreeExplainer can be found in Lundberg et al (2019a).TreeExplainer is employed in this study to calculate the SHAP values for the XGBoost, RandomForest, and CART models to assess the contribution of hydro-environmental features to the prediction. "Connection weight" (Garson, 1991), Partial derivative (Dimopoulos et al, 1995), or input variable disturbance (Qi et al, 2016) are some more approaches for analyzing the feature sensitivity of neural network models. These approaches are, nevertheless, "local sensitivity analysis" methods, which only assess the impact of one input variable on the outcome.…”
Section: Shap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…., P m ] T were input to the well-trained DBN model to obtain two results R 1 and R 1 . Then, the mean difference of R 1 and R 1 , which is defined as the MIV of P 1 , was calculated using Formula (3) (Dombi et al, 1995;Liu et al, 2012;Qi et al, 2016):…”
Section: Evaluation Index Of Significance Of Individual Muscle Group mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the principal components were sorted according to the absolute values of the MIVs to obtain the relative impact of each model input on the output. The one corresponding to the largest MIV exerted the most important influence on the output (Dombi et al, 1995;Liu et al, 2012;Qi et al, 2016). If over one input corresponds to a muscle group, the maximum MIV of these input units was considered as the final index for this muscle group.…”
Section: Evaluation Index Of Significance Of Individual Muscle Group mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the PNN algorithm is improved from the two aspects of accuracy and complexity. On the one hand, the mean impact value (MIV) algorithm [26,27] is used for variable selection, which simplifies the complexity of the algorithm and eliminates the characteristic values with large errors in the ECG detection and extraction process. On the other hand, therobabilistic neural network by whale optimization algorithm (WOA-PNN) is proposed, which uses WOA [28][29][30] to optimize the smoothing factor in PNN, improve the accuracy of the model classification and solve the problem that the smoothing factor of the PNN algorithm needs to be artificially given.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%