Research Methods with Disabled Populations

Eckhardt, Elizabeth A.; Anastas, Jeane W.

doi:10.1300/j198v06n01_13

Cited by 17 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…24, 25 The AG was involved in development of the study objectives, selection of a geographic location for the study, participant recruitment, development of the interview guide, and subsequent analysis of the data. The research team conducted semistructured interviews with farmers, their spouses, and service providers in designated communities within the Central Regional Health Authority (CRHA) (one of 11 regional health authorities) in Manitoba, Canada.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community Support Systems for Farmers Who Live With Disability

Friesen

Krassikouva-Enns²,

Ringaert³

et al. 2010

Journal of Agromedicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To return to farming following the onset of a disabling injury or health condition is predicated on a supportive environment for the farm owner-operator. The purpose of this study was to examine barriers and facilitators of returning to work after an injury or acquired disability, and to identify community supports (formal and informal) needed and available to farmers. This was a qualitative study using a participatory action research approach that involved a research team, an advisory group of seven stakeholder participants and semistructured interviews with farmers, their spouses, and service providers in the study communities. A total of 11 farmers and 17 service providers took part in a focus group or were interviewed individually with or without the spouse present. Focus group discussions and interviews were transcribed and analyzed using constant comparison method and team consensus of findings. Themes of barriers and facilitators for return to farming were identified as health care services, financial and economic issues, and "hands-on" assistance. Themes were organized into an ecological conceptual diagram depicting barriers and facilitators in the microsystem of the farm family, the mesosystem of the local farming community and regional health jurisdictions, and the macrosystem of the province and/or nation's social, legislative, and economic realities. Enhancing community support systems for farmers who become disabled as a result of injury or illness will require a multilevel system approach that involves health, financial, and labor resources.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community Support Systems for Farmers Who Live With Disability

Friesen

Krassikouva-Enns²,

Ringaert³

et al. 2010

Journal of Agromedicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…59–60). In addition, Eckhardt and Anastas (2013) noted that “on average the deaf adult will not understand more than 26%–40% of one-on-one conversation through lip-reading” (p. 241), and the U.S. Department of Justice (USDOJ, 2006) noted that “only about one third of spoken words can be understood by speech reading.” However, it is again important to recognize that some deaf individuals do not sign and may in fact choose lip reading as their preferred mode of communication. Despite the controversy noted above, signing should not be imposed on a deaf individual.…”

Section: Forensic Psychologists and Individuals Who Are Deafmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why language matters: What forensic psychologists need to know about the deaf community, American Sign Language, and interpreters.

Feldman,

Caggiano,

Beldon-Feldman

2023

Practice Innovations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Consequently, service users and research participants are seen as patients, relatively powerless, in need of assistance, and lacking any relevant knowledge or experience (Beresford, 2013). This perspective has led to their frequent exclusion from research and policy design and implementation (Chenoweth, 2016;Cocks, 2008;Eckhardt and Anastas, 2007), a phenomenon Oliver (1992) has described as "research as alienation" (p. 103). Social work has therefore come under sharp critique from disability scholars and activists, in part for these dynamics but also for the paternalism and unequal power relations they reinforce.…”

Section: Drawing Connections: Disability Praxis Performance Ethnogramentioning

confidence: 99%

Centering embodiment in disability research through performance ethnography

Chaudhry

2018

Qualitative Social Work

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, I bring disability studies and critical qualitative pedagogies to bear upon methodological concerns of social work to think through questions of disability embodiment, positionality, representation and political engagement in doing disability research. Combining methodological tools of performance ethnography with critical disability praxis, I present an example of what I term critical disability performance ethnography, a research methodology that has much potential for social work-particularly with respect to its emphasis on achieving social justice. I illuminate the transformative potential of shared disability embodiment in the process of knowledge production through my experiences as a disabled researcher doing disability research, while also drawing attention to the broader issues concerning disability and neoliberal development in the global south.

show abstract

Research Methods with Disabled Populations

Cited by 17 publications

References 19 publications

Community Support Systems for Farmers Who Live With Disability

Community Support Systems for Farmers Who Live With Disability

Why language matters: What forensic psychologists need to know about the deaf community, American Sign Language, and interpreters.

Centering embodiment in disability research through performance ethnography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About