Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Examples Informed by a Decade of Collaborative Work With Majority World Women’s Grassroots Activism

Abstract

Very few theories have generated the kind of interdisciplinary and international engagement that marks the intellectual history of intersectionality, leaving some authors to suggest that intersectionality is the most important theoretical contribution that the field of women's studies has made thus far. Yet, consideration of intersectionality as a research paradigm has yet to gain a wide foothold in mainstream psychology. The current article uses a program of multimethod research designed in partnership with, and intending to center the intersectional experiences of, majority world women to propose a research agenda for the empirical study of intersectionality. Specifically, it is suggested that a research agenda rooted in intersectional understandings requires that: (1) researchers think carefully about social categories of analysis and how their methodological choices can best answer those questions, (2) psychologists reposition their research questions to examine processes by which structural inequities lead to power imbalances and gender-based norms that sustain women's experience of marginalization and oppression, and (3) we understand how intersectional experiences can be applied toward change. Intersectional investigations hold a key to interrupting the structural dimensions of power that result in egregious consequences to peoples' social, economic, and political lives, but only if we radically restructure what we think about knowledge, our roles, and the products of our research.

Cardiovascular health through a sex and gender lens in six South Asian countries: Findings from the WHO STEPS surveillance

“…The findings of this study highlight the importance of sex-specific preventive programs to target both males and females who are disproportionality impacted by the gender-related factors. Furthermore, the contrasts identified between sex, gender-related factors and CVD risk and outcomes suggest that while age/sex-stratified analyses are an imperative first step, health outcomes research going forward must be rooted in an intersectional understanding of the influence of age, sex, gender, culture, ethnicity and country, on CVD risk factors and CV health [ 38 ].…”

The Risks and Outcomes of Getting Help for Marginalised People: Navigating Access to Social Assistance in Crises

“…Intersectionality analysis can provide a bottomup approach to research and can be used in qualitative, quantitative, and/or mixed-methods research. Covering varied research areas such as health, sociology, and psychology, in-depth interviews, focus groups, and ethnography remain common methods for intersectional analysis within the qualitative arena (in addition to tools such as concept mapping and deliberative dialogue), whereas regression models and hierarchical linear models (HLM) are among the quantitative tools, which are still used but less frequently (Bailey et al 2019;Bauer et al 2021;Christoffersen 2017;Fehrenbacher and Patel 2019;Grabe 2020;Grace 2014;Hankivsky 2012).…”

Mainstreaming Gender-Responsive One Health: Now Is the Time

“…Strengthening gender equity in health systems actually requires the identification of the deep drivers of women underrepresentation using an intersectional approach, as well as involving experts in organizational psychology (organizational psychologists) in studying organizational drivers of underrepresentation (36)(37)(38) or gender analysis (9).…”