2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research joint ventures and technological proximity

Abstract: We study research joint ventures (RJV) given that knowledge spillovers depend positively on the technological proximity between firms. Possible scenarios differ in the intensity of collaboration, i.e., the (non)coordination of research activities and the extent of knowledge sharing. The investigation of bilateral RJVs in an oligopolistic market allows to distinguish effects for insider and outsider firms. Our central findings are (i) RJVs do not generally outperform competitive research with respect to innovat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, EMFs always tend to focus on incremental changes to absorb and apply existing practices and technologies; they also tend to carry out technological activities in similar fields (Shi et al, 2020). This is because the similar technological portfolios facilitate technological learning (M€ uller and Zaby, 2019). Existing studies merely show the linear or curvilinear relationship between the technological proximity and its outcomes, such as innovation performance, knowledge creation and organizational collaboration Vrande, 2013).…”
Section: Technological Proximity Learning Mechanisms and Capability U...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, EMFs always tend to focus on incremental changes to absorb and apply existing practices and technologies; they also tend to carry out technological activities in similar fields (Shi et al, 2020). This is because the similar technological portfolios facilitate technological learning (M€ uller and Zaby, 2019). Existing studies merely show the linear or curvilinear relationship between the technological proximity and its outcomes, such as innovation performance, knowledge creation and organizational collaboration Vrande, 2013).…”
Section: Technological Proximity Learning Mechanisms and Capability U...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, learning is not a straightforward process that just involves the transfer of "discrete nuggets of knowledge or technology" from one to another (Wang et al, 2014). Technological proximity can help firms absorb knowledge and develop new recombinations during the learning process (Knoben and Oerlemans, 2006;M€ uller and Zaby, 2019). This is what is required for capability upgrading (Shi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the profit allocation mechanisms based on cooperative game theory are used. Müller and Zaby (2019) utilized game theory to determine the best cooperation scenario, including no participation and only competition, no participation in R&D but technology sharing and joint R&D, and each strategy's profit for alliance partners.…”
Section: Cooperative Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the profit split mechanisms, some points should be mentioned. For a less complicated problem, the game theory approaches such as sequential bargaining models (Yan, 2012;Yan and Yang, 2012), cooperative game theory based on the Shapley value (Sun et al, 2019, Zhang et al, 2019, core concept (Wu et al, 2017;Marzband et al, 2017), and competitive game theory (Müller and Zaby, 2019) could be referred. Moreover, for more complex problems in which the value of coalitions by different players or the value of different strategies of players could not be determined straightforwardly, other logical PAP mechanisms have been applied.…”
Section: Profit Splitmentioning
confidence: 99%