2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b02549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research into the Polynomial Alpha Function for the Cubic Equation of State

Abstract: Alpha functions usually aim at predicting the thermodynamic properties of specific compounds in a limited range of reduced temperatures. The differences between polynomial alpha functions are mainly the functional forms and the parameter correlations. In this work, the functional forms, the parameter correlations, and the scope of 64 polynomial alpha functions are reviewed. The inherent relationships between the polynomial alpha functions as well as developing trends are also discussed. These functions were mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[70] Peng-Robinson's (PR) cubic equation of state with BostonÀMathias (BM) alpha function [71] was selected as a thermodynamic property method since it can accurately predict thermodynamic properties of interest for this study due to its closer compression factor (0.307) to that of real hydrocarbons (0.27-0.29). [72,73] This method, represented in Aspen Plus [74] as the PR-BM method, is the most commonly used property method in gas processing, refining, petrochemicals, and biomass pyrolysis applications. [41,62,75] Aspen Plus performs material and energy balance based on the product distribution and the specified heat of reaction of the components involved.…”
Section: Computational Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[70] Peng-Robinson's (PR) cubic equation of state with BostonÀMathias (BM) alpha function [71] was selected as a thermodynamic property method since it can accurately predict thermodynamic properties of interest for this study due to its closer compression factor (0.307) to that of real hydrocarbons (0.27-0.29). [72,73] This method, represented in Aspen Plus [74] as the PR-BM method, is the most commonly used property method in gas processing, refining, petrochemicals, and biomass pyrolysis applications. [41,62,75] Aspen Plus performs material and energy balance based on the product distribution and the specified heat of reaction of the components involved.…”
Section: Computational Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hydrocarbon mixtures with heavy fractions, however, the PR EoS is somewhat more accurate, especially, in predicting liquid density. These EoSs are still subject of research to improve their accuracies [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%