1998
DOI: 10.3386/w6696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research, Innovation, and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

33
923
2
66

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 806 publications
(1,024 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
33
923
2
66
Order By: Relevance
“…Crépon et al, 1998;Heshmati 2001, 2002;Klomp and Van Leeuwen, 2001). Although such research is increasingly sophisticated in terms of econometrics, there is rarely any explicit consideration given to the nature of the innovation decision itself.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Crépon et al, 1998;Heshmati 2001, 2002;Klomp and Van Leeuwen, 2001). Although such research is increasingly sophisticated in terms of econometrics, there is rarely any explicit consideration given to the nature of the innovation decision itself.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is most evident in the recent empirical literature examining the 'knowledge production function', which invariably either ignores process innovation or treats it as a subsidiary issue with no explicit consideration of how firms make the relevant decisions (e.g. Crépon et al, 1998;Heshmati 2001, 2002;Klomp and Van Leeuwen, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The richness of data on innovation in emerging and developed countries has allowed researchers to implement an econometric approach, such as the widely used Crépon-DuguetMairesse (CDM) structural model (Crepon et al, 1998), in which firm performance are a function of product and/or process innovation, which in turn are explained by R&D and other innovation expenditures. In the context of developing income countries, the lack of data at longitudinal level and the fact that for the vast majority of firms R&D activities are only a marginal determinant in innovation activities have posed several challenges in modelling innovation and growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying a structural model in the spirit of the CDM (Crepon, Mairessec, and Duguet 1998) model, they found that levies and regulation are positively correlated with environmentally friendly investments in process innovation (0/1 decision). However, due to the dependent variable (eco investments 0/1) it was not possible to insert subsidies in the adoption equation, which might drive the observed effects of the other policy variables (levies, regulation).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…van Leeuwen and Mohen (2017) could use a comprehensive Dutch data set (see above) and they did not only investigate the 0/1 choice for process-integrated, environmentally friendly investments, they also investigated the policy effects on the investment intensity using the Crepon, Duguet, and Mairessec (1998) framework. The 0/1 choice and the intensity effects have been estimated simultaneously taking into account potential selection issues.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%