Research for impact: three keys for research implementation

Abstract

Impact is essential to research, policymaking and implementation. Yet impact is often misunderstood or poorly defined. For public policy scholars, concerns about impact exist largely on two planes. On one level scholars seek to understand the impacts of policy interventions. On a second level scholars aim for their public policy research to generate real-world impact. These two concernsthe "what" and the "how" of researchare often treated separately. In this article, we argue that it is worthwhile joining up these concerns about impact. This is possible, we suggest, through a combination of logic models and a novel rethink of the usual "pathway to research impact". The article introduces two research co-design tools aimed at improving the likelihood of achieving research impact, while also improving understanding of those impacts: an integrated knowledge translation (IKT)-informed logic model and an implementation science (IS)-derived Pathway to Impact. We draw on a multi-year research co-creation project to develop the Infrastructure Engagement Excellence (IEE) Standards for Australia's $250 billion infrastructure sector. This co-creation project illustrates the development of the logic model, Pathway to Impact and consequent research co-design process. Together, these tools can support policy scholars' efforts to produce impactful research while also creating better understanding of policy and practice impacts, and how to achieve them. We conclude that genuine and robust research co-design requires researchers to commit not only to undertaking research with rigor, but also a willingness to dedicate thought and effort to the relationship between what research activities are carried out and how those processes can advance policy and practice outcomes and impact.

Higher Education Institutions and Multistakeholders’ Engagement: A Longitudinal Study of an Anchor Institution's Legitimacy and Dynamism

“…Alternatively, large corporations might use single researchers as an extension of their employees. To this extent, this study contributes to the already-developing literature on impactful research [12], [44].…”

“…This is certainly one of the most significant outcomes of prioritizing communication. If nothing else, this change will mean implementing new mechanisms and making investments in training to support the transition of activities from "what" to "how" [44]. This final proposition affects the area of anchored institution management.…”

Uneasy bedfellows: Integrating urban research and policymaking in Australia

“…As a method, participatory research has existed since the 1940s and can be characterised generally by the focus on research impact on policy as well as a participatory and reflective approach to research. Researchers active in co-research describe the complexity and messiness of engaging organisations and managing interactions with stakeholders and influential actors (Whitzman 2017;Jones and Bice 2021). Partnerships created through combined funding arrangements and commitments linked to administration priorities may involve compromises in terms of agendas as well as the interpretation and use of evidence.…”