Research Ethics I: Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)—Historical and Contemporary Issues Pertaining to Human and Animal Experimentation

Horner, Jennifer; Minifie, Fred D.

doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0265)

Cited by 35 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 171 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…the Ref. [34]. Only by including cultural competence in research courses can future health care professionals truly become responsible researchers.…”

Section: Cultural Competence and Ethical Decision Making In Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Competence and Ethical Decision Making for Health Care Professionals

Louw

2016

HSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Cultural competence and ethical decision making are two separate, yet intrinsically related concepts which are central to services rendered by all health care professionals. Cultural competence is based on ethical principles and informs ethical decision making. In spite of this important connection, the interrelationship of these two concepts does not receive the attention it deserves in the literature. This issue is addressed by appraising the training and assessment of cultural competence and ethical decision making in the health care professions. The integrated relationship of these two concepts is illustrated within the broader contexts of higher education, research and clinical practice. Health care professionals who incorporate cultural competence and ethical decision making will be empowered to provide the best services to their clients/ patients in multicultural contexts to ensure optimum outcomes.

show abstract

“…the Ref. [34]. Only by including cultural competence in research courses can future health care professionals truly become responsible researchers.…”

Section: Cultural Competence and Ethical Decision Making In Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cultural Competence and Ethical Decision Making for Health Care Professionals

Louw

2016

HSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, if a government strictly limits research dealing with smallpox, progress in the field of theoretical physics would, most likely, be unaffected. 10 Second, the recent history of science in America shows us that scientific advancement and rapid technological progress, particularly in the field of biomedical science, has thrived under systemic and ever-heightening restrictions and government regulation of science, certain avenues of research, and publications of research findings (Horner and Minifie 2011). To assume that regulating some kinds of science will inevitably lead to hindered scientific progress is a slippery slope we should not assume to be a legitimate threat to scientific progress.…”

Section: Limiting Science Limiting Rights and Democratic Societymentioning

confidence: 99%

Scientific Research and Human Rights: A Response to Kitcher on the Limitations of Inquiry

Victor

2013

Sci Eng Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In his recent work exploring the role of science in democratic societies Kitcher (Science in a democratic society. Prometheus Books, New York, 2011) claims that scientists ought to have a prominent role in setting the agenda for and limits to research. Against the backdrop of the claim that the proper limits of scientific inquiry is John Stuart Mill’s Harm Principle (Kitcher in Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001), he identifies the limits of inquiry as the point where the outcomes of research could cause harm to already vulnerable populations. Nonetheless, Kitcher argues against explicit limitations on unscrupulous research on the grounds that restrictions would exacerbate underlying social problems. I show that Kitcher’s argument in favor of dissuading inquiry through conventional standards is problematic and falls prey to the same critique he offers in opposition to official bans. I expand the conversation of limiting scientific research by recognizing that the actions that count as ‘science’ are located in the space between ‘thinking’ and ‘doing’. In this space, we often attempt to balance freedom of research, as scientific speech, against the disparate impact citizens might experience in light of such research. I end by exploring if such disparate impact justifies limiting research, within the context of the United States, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or under international human rights standards more generally.

show abstract

“…This evolving literature includes both philosophical inquiry into the meaning of RCR concepts and empirical studies rooted in quantitative and qualitative analysis of trainees' (to include undergraduate, graduate, postdoctoral fellows, and faculty as students) knowledge and attitudes concerning RCR (Alfredo & Hart, 2011;Antes et al, 2010;Bird, 2001Bird, , 2006Brown, Ablin, & Wheatley, 2010;DuBois, Dueker, Anderson, & Campbell, 2008;DuBois, Schilling, Heitman, Steneck, & Kon, 2010;Fiore & Cushman, 2011;Gefenas, 2006;Heitman, Olsen, Anestidou, & Bulger, 2007;Horner & Minifie, 2011a, 2011b, 2011cHren et al, 2006;Kalichman, 2007Kalichman, , 2009Kalichman & Plemmons, 2007;Macrina, Funk, & Barrett, 2004;Master, 2011;Minifie et al, 2011;Pimple, 2002;Plemmons, 2011;Plemmons, Brody, & Kalichman, 2006;Powell, Allison, & Kalichman, 2007;Rhoades, 2002;Roland, 2007;Scheetz, 2007;Shamoo & Moreno, 2004;Shamoo & Resnik, 2009;Steneck & Bulger, 2007;Vallero, 2007;Whitbeck, 2001;Zeng & Resnik, 2010). Although the majority of empirical research on RCR responds to problems in training in U.S. universities, our work, situated in an international setting, addresses concerns of both U.S. and international institutions interested to improve outcomes from RCR training initiatives (Ajuwon & Kass, 2008).…”

Section: Our Projectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responsible Conduct of Research Training and Trust Between Research Postgraduate Students and Supervisors

Jordan¹,

Gray

2012

Ethics & Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Does responsible conduct of research (RCR) training improve levels of trust between researchers? Using data gathered as part of a survey on the attitudes of master's and doctoral-level students toward RCR, we found that RCR training correlated with a weakened beliefs of students toward their supervisors' ethicality but a stronger belief in the ethicality of their peers. We believe that these findings point to new avenues of research on trust in the academic setting and to needs for curriculum changes in RCR training.

show abstract

Research Ethics I: Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)—Historical and Contemporary Issues Pertaining to Human and Animal Experimentation

Cited by 35 publications

References 171 publications

Cultural Competence and Ethical Decision Making for Health Care Professionals

Cultural Competence and Ethical Decision Making for Health Care Professionals

Scientific Research and Human Rights: A Response to Kitcher on the Limitations of Inquiry

Responsible Conduct of Research Training and Trust Between Research Postgraduate Students and Supervisors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About