2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1460765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Efficiency in Manufacturing: An Application of DEA at the Industry Level

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the narrower focus of the current research, particularly on micro and small enterprises, some of the results can differ from the other research. The results in Table 2 differ from those reported by Schmidt-Ehmcke [72] which placed Germany and Denmark on the top of the efficiency ranking. At the same time, the results obtained are in line with previous studies like Krišt'áková et al [27] that the Slovak wood-processing enterprises performed better than the Bulgarian ones in terms of CCR efficiency.…”
Section: Dea Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Due to the narrower focus of the current research, particularly on micro and small enterprises, some of the results can differ from the other research. The results in Table 2 differ from those reported by Schmidt-Ehmcke [72] which placed Germany and Denmark on the top of the efficiency ranking. At the same time, the results obtained are in line with previous studies like Krišt'áková et al [27] that the Slovak wood-processing enterprises performed better than the Bulgarian ones in terms of CCR efficiency.…”
Section: Dea Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…In this particular study, the output data under publications included international journal publications, local journal publications, international books, international book chapters, local book chapters, international conferences, local conferences and other types of publications such as magazine articles and handbooks. Four of the data sets were related to technology outputs which were the number of patents (Cullman et al, 2009;Schmidt-Ehmcke and Zloczysti, 2009), trademarks, copyrights and industrial designs. Human resources development contained four data sets; postdoctoral, PhD graduate, master graduate and undergraduate.…”
Section: Data and Variables Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some national analyses implement richer models in order to test some interesting additional hypotheses. One such example is that of Schmidt‐Ehmcke and Zloczysti (), who differentiate between knowledge production across sectors and Cullmann et al . () who distinguish the impact of private and public R&D and different institutional and regulatory frameworks.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%