2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research designs for proof-of-concept chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment efficacy was quantified by calculating absolute differences and percentage change from baseline in both NPRS score and PTA. For each patient, a response was considered clinically relevant if the NPRS score was reduced by at least 30% relative to baseline [6,[8][9][10]. Mean and median statistics (with 95% CI) were computed for percentage change and absolute change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment efficacy was quantified by calculating absolute differences and percentage change from baseline in both NPRS score and PTA. For each patient, a response was considered clinically relevant if the NPRS score was reduced by at least 30% relative to baseline [6,[8][9][10]. Mean and median statistics (with 95% CI) were computed for percentage change and absolute change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that placebo effects are typically large in trials of intra-articular therapies 38 , and the use of an active control may have further inflated the reported therapeutic effect 39,40 . However, this inflation of patient expectation was applicable to both arms and did not confound differentiation of the 40-mg FX006 dose from immediate-release triamcinolone acetonide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome of clinical trials in pain is strongly affected by the type of pain being treated, study design, patient population, and many related factors (Gewandter et al, 2014). Whereas preclinical studies are typically conducted in a genetically and environmentally (usually unenriched) uniform population of often young (and male) rodents, human populations enrolled in clinical pain trials tend to be older and of both sexes and are invariably more heterogeneous.…”
Section: Reconciling Preclinical and Clinical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%