Abstract:Introduction-Bipolar Disorder is characterized by recurrent episodes of depression and/or mania along with interepisodic mood symptoms that interfere with psychosocial functioning. Despite periods of symptomatic recovery, individuals with bipolar disorder often continue to experience impairments in psychosocial functioning, particularly occupational functioning. Two determinants of psychosocial functioning of euthymic (neither fully depressed nor manic) individuals with bipolar disorder are residual depressive… Show more
“…Furthermore, the identification of cross-disorder neuropsychological profiles could lend additional support to the cognitive continuum hypothesis (Ancín et al, 2010;Bora, Yucel, & Pantelis, 2009), which suggests that the differences in cognitive impairment between disorders such as schizophrenia and BD are quantitative rather than qualitative. These hypotheses have important implications for diagnostic classification as well as treatment planning, especially in light of the growing interest in cognitive and functional rehabilitation programs (Deckersbach et al, 2010;Torrent et al, 2011), which currently target each disorder as a whole, but could benefit from adjustments for the cognitive subprofiles displayed by each diagnostic category.…”
Objectives: Cognitive dysfunction is a key feature of major depressive (MDD) and bipolar (BD) disorders. However, rather than a single cognitive profile corresponding to each diagnostic categories, recent studies have identified significant intra-and cross-diagnostic variability in patterns of cognitive impairment. The goal of this study was to contribute to the literature on cognitive heterogeneity in mood disorders by identifying cognitive subprofiles in a population of patients with MDD, BD type I, BD type II, and healthy adults. Methods: Participants completed a neuropsychological battery; scores were converted into Z-scores using normative data and submitted to hierarchical cluster analysis. Results: Three distinct neuropsychological clusters were identified: (1) a large cluster containing mostly control participants, as well as some patients with BD and MDD, who performed at above-average levels on all neuropsychological domains; (2) a cluster containing some patients from all diagnostic groups, as well as healthy controls, who performed worse than cluster 1 on most tasks, and showed impairments in motor inhibition and verbal fluency; (3) a cluster containing mostly patients with mood disorders with severe impairments in verbal inhibition and cognitive flexibility. Conclusions: These findings revealed multiple cognitive profiles within diagnostic categories, as well as significant cross-diagnostic overlap, highlighting the importance of developing more specific treatment approaches which consider patients' demographic and cognitive profiles in addition to their diagnosis. (JINS, 2017, 23, 584-593)
“…Furthermore, the identification of cross-disorder neuropsychological profiles could lend additional support to the cognitive continuum hypothesis (Ancín et al, 2010;Bora, Yucel, & Pantelis, 2009), which suggests that the differences in cognitive impairment between disorders such as schizophrenia and BD are quantitative rather than qualitative. These hypotheses have important implications for diagnostic classification as well as treatment planning, especially in light of the growing interest in cognitive and functional rehabilitation programs (Deckersbach et al, 2010;Torrent et al, 2011), which currently target each disorder as a whole, but could benefit from adjustments for the cognitive subprofiles displayed by each diagnostic category.…”
Objectives: Cognitive dysfunction is a key feature of major depressive (MDD) and bipolar (BD) disorders. However, rather than a single cognitive profile corresponding to each diagnostic categories, recent studies have identified significant intra-and cross-diagnostic variability in patterns of cognitive impairment. The goal of this study was to contribute to the literature on cognitive heterogeneity in mood disorders by identifying cognitive subprofiles in a population of patients with MDD, BD type I, BD type II, and healthy adults. Methods: Participants completed a neuropsychological battery; scores were converted into Z-scores using normative data and submitted to hierarchical cluster analysis. Results: Three distinct neuropsychological clusters were identified: (1) a large cluster containing mostly control participants, as well as some patients with BD and MDD, who performed at above-average levels on all neuropsychological domains; (2) a cluster containing some patients from all diagnostic groups, as well as healthy controls, who performed worse than cluster 1 on most tasks, and showed impairments in motor inhibition and verbal fluency; (3) a cluster containing mostly patients with mood disorders with severe impairments in verbal inhibition and cognitive flexibility. Conclusions: These findings revealed multiple cognitive profiles within diagnostic categories, as well as significant cross-diagnostic overlap, highlighting the importance of developing more specific treatment approaches which consider patients' demographic and cognitive profiles in addition to their diagnosis. (JINS, 2017, 23, 584-593)
“…Finally, three studies provided figures for withdrawals and dropouts. Deckersbach et al 17 reported five dropouts from 18 participants and Preiss et al 18 reported 21 dropouts out of 45 participants at study outset. Torrent et al 20 reported that 28.6% patients discontinued in the functional remediation group, 24.4% discontinued rehabilitation in BD are more likely to be published.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 However, our results also show that each CR program had its own specific aims, such as emotional and social training 19 or improvement of attention, memory and planning. 17 Similarly, while most of the CR programs comprised a total of approximately 17 hours, they varied in terms of the number of session per week, from one 20 to three. 18 emotional recognition and emotional perception.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study conducted a follow-up assessment. 17 Figure 2 illustrates the total duration of interventions in weeks and the assessment points used in each study. 17 and Preiss et al 18 focused on psychosocial and daily life functioning.…”
Section: Study Design and Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Figure 2 illustrates the total duration of interventions in weeks and the assessment points used in each study. 17 and Preiss et al 18 focused on psychosocial and daily life functioning. In contrast, both Lahera et al 19 and Torrent et al 20 focused specifically on cognitive functioning, but whereas the former emphasized social cognition and emotion recognition, the latter emphasized There were notable increases in social cognition, in the psychoeducation group, and 17.5% discontinued in the treatment-as-usual group.…”
Introduction: It has been shown that bipolar disorder (BD) has a direct impact on neurocognitive functioning and behavior. This finding has prompted studies to investigate cognitive enhancement programs as potential treatments for BD, primarily focusing on cognitive reinforcement and daily functioning and not restricted to psychoeducation and coping strategies, unlike traditional psychosocial treatments. Objective: This study presents a systematic review of controlled trials of cognitive rehabilitation (CR) for BD. Our main objective is to describe the results of studies of rehabilitation programs for BD and related methodological issues. Method: Electronic database searches (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Embase) were conducted to identify articles using terms related to BD and CR. The methodological quality of each article was measured using the 5-item Jadad scale. Results: A total of 239 articles were initially identified, but after application of exclusion criteria, only four were retained for this review. An average of 17 hours of intervention sessions were conducted, distributed as 0.95 hours per week and three of the four studies reported better executive function performance after CR interventions. Conclusions: We did not find robust evidence to support cognitive rehabilitation as an effective treatment for BD, because of: 1) the variety of intervention designs; 2) the methodological limitations of the studies; and 3) the lack of studies in the field.
Research suggests that cognitive behavioral therapy for bipolar disorder can be a powerful adjunctive intervention for the treatment of bipolar disorder. This chapter provides a discussion of the empirical status of cognitive behavioral therapy for bipolar disorder, and an overview of intervention strategies and clinical issues unique to this patient group. Important treatment elements described here include psychoeducation, medication adherence strategies, mood monitoring and early intervention for mood episodes, cognitive restructuring, and lifestyle and stress management techniques.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.