2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(01)00161-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research at DLR Göttingen on bluff body aerodynamics, drag reduction by wake ventilation and active flow control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A full-scale DSA350 pantograph was measured in a wind tunnel by means of acoustic mirror techniques [79]. Strong noise sources were identified at the foot, the panhead and the knee joint.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full-scale DSA350 pantograph was measured in a wind tunnel by means of acoustic mirror techniques [79]. Strong noise sources were identified at the foot, the panhead and the knee joint.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There they concluded that the vortex formation process is increasingly two-dimensional when the body is close to the wall. There have been several studies on the wake structure and aerodynamic drag reduction for vehicle-like bodies [9,19]. Those studies and the references there-in provide several results based on either PIV measurement or direct computation of three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations with k-" turbulence model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vortex shedding of longitudinal edges on the afterbody is the major source of aerodynamics drag for a vehicle-like body [9]. The vortex shedding and downforce are in uenced by the boundary layer along the ground.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the diffuser exhaust (station 3) will not influence the static pressure in the bluff body wake. The experimental data provided by Grosche24 and Georgiou25 indicate that such an interaction is indeed possible.…”
Section: The One‐dimensional Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%