In this conceptual article, we explore the idea of refining the role of the researcher. Using emotional intelligence as a framework, we synthesize methodological writing about the role of the researcher and ways to enhance the connection between humans in qualitative research. Emotional intelligence can strengthen the ability to connect with participants, skillfully listen during the interview process, and more clearly understand the lifeworlds participants articulate.
Keywords: role of the researcher, emotional intelligenceInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods 2014, 13 89 In the course of writing about the fundamentalist Christian school and community, I stumbled upon (and over) the angular contours of my own strong feelings.-from The Color of Strangers, The Color of Friends (Peshkin, 1991, p. 4) In the quotation above, Peshkin (1991) names a common element that accompanies most qualitative researchers on their research journeys: strong feelings. Peshkin claims that a central aspect of these strong feelings was the fact that he is Jewish. Like many researchers, his strong feelings caused him to stumble, and hopefully to reflect on the source of these feelings, as well as the ways in which they impacted his fieldwork. "As a result," Peshkin (1991) claims, "I was alerted to the necessity of being mindful-throughout, not at the end of, my inquiry-of what sentiments and values were being evoked" (p. 4). As a seasoned researcher, Peshkin was able to be mindful; he reflected on the source of his emotions throughout the research process. Yet, many novice researchers either deny their feelings or struggle to identify those feelings about their research and then are lost in their efforts to grapple with these feelings once they are uncovered. Awareness (being mindful) is but the first step in the process of reflecting on how strong feelings might impact or illuminate the fieldwork of qualitative research. In therapy, one has a professional (the therapist) to guide you as you sort through strong feelings. Not so in qualitative research. In fact, graduate courses do little to address feelings evoked through the research process and how to handle them. Behar (1996) found anthropological inquiry to be:Loss, mourning, the longing for memory, the desire to enter into the world around you and having no idea how to do it, the fear of observing too coldly or too distractedly or too raggedly, the rage of cowardice, the insight that is always arriving late, as defiant hindsight, a sense of the utter uselessness of writing anything and yet the burning desire to write something. (p. 3) Behar (1996) concluded her initial thoughts about this kind of inquiry by reflecting that this is not the anthropology being taught in our colleges and universities, and regretfully noting that "It doesn't sound like the stuff of which Ph.D.'s are made" (p. 3).Face to face social interaction is the most regularly experienced social reality. The core of social and personal being rests in immediate contact with other humans. Howev...