2021
DOI: 10.4238/gmr18733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research Article Pathogenesis of eosinophilic vs. non-eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis in Vietnamese

Abstract: The study of the characteristics of non-eosinophilic and eosinophilic chronic polyposis rhinosinusitis (CRSwNP) is necessary to improve understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of this disease and determine the optimal treatment strategy. We studied the specific features of eosinophilic and noneosinophilic CRSwNP in Vietnamese patients. Patients (48 male and 35 female) with a diagnosis of CRSwNP took part in the work. Patients were operated on at the National ENT Hospital from 9/2017 to 8/2018. Based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We abstracted data on numbers of patients, sex, nationality, diagnostic criteria, outcomes of additional tests performed to evaluate ECRS, and the P -values for comparisons of ECRS and non-ECRS. Analyzed outcomes were the percentage or absolute count of eosinophils [ 3 - 5 , 9 - 51 ], total non-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) [ 3 , 4 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 21 - 23 , 30 , 35 , 39 - 41 , 48 , 52 - 54 ], endoscopic polyp score [ 3 , 9 , 28 - 30 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 51 , 52 , 54 - 59 ], nasal symptomatic score [ 3 , 31 , 33 , 37 , 40 , 41 , 46 , 50 - 52 , 55 - 58 , 60 ], olfactory function [ 23 , 25 - 27 , 30 , 37 , 41 ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We abstracted data on numbers of patients, sex, nationality, diagnostic criteria, outcomes of additional tests performed to evaluate ECRS, and the P -values for comparisons of ECRS and non-ECRS. Analyzed outcomes were the percentage or absolute count of eosinophils [ 3 - 5 , 9 - 51 ], total non-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) [ 3 , 4 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 19 , 21 - 23 , 30 , 35 , 39 - 41 , 48 , 52 - 54 ], endoscopic polyp score [ 3 , 9 , 28 - 30 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 38 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 51 , 52 , 54 - 59 ], nasal symptomatic score [ 3 , 31 , 33 , 37 , 40 , 41 , 46 , 50 - 52 , 55 - 58 , 60 ], olfactory function [ 23 , 25 - 27 , 30 , 37 , 41 ,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We abstracted data on numbers of patients, sex, nationality, diagnostic criteria, outcomes of additional tests performed to evaluate ECRS, and the P-values for comparisons of ECRS and non-ECRS. Analyzed outcomes were the percentage or absolute count of eosinophils [3][4][5], total non-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) [3,4,13,15,16,19,[21][22][23]30,35,[39][40][41]48,[52][53][54], endoscopic polyp score [3,9,[28][29][30]32,33,37,38,40,41,43,51,52,[54][55][56][57][58][59], nasal symptomatic score [3,31,33,37,40,41,46,[50]…”
Section: Data Organization and Risk Of Bias Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%