2016
DOI: 10.32601/ejal.460995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research and reflective practice in the EFL classroom: Voices from Armenia

Abstract: A sociocultural perspective of teacher development honours the rich knowledge base that teachers work from as they strive to connect theory ("expert" knowledge) to practice ("experiential" knowledge). The present paper explores classroom research and reflective practice as forms of teacher-led inquiry for the EFL context. In particular, this study explores the extent to which Armenian EFL teachers engage in classroom research, the challenges they face therein, and whether or not they consider themselves to be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflection-in-action involves monitoring and assessing one's own and others' behavior in teaching and learning events (cited in Edwards, 2017). Cirocki and Farrelly (2016), in turn, also established the nature of reflective teaching and distinguished between three types of reflection such as content reflection (what), process reflection (how), and premise reflection (why). Furthermore, Senge (1990, cited in Taggart & Wilson, 2005 identified three types of reflection; (1) technical reflection, (2) practical reflection, and (3) critical reflection.…”
Section: Components Of Reflective Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reflection-in-action involves monitoring and assessing one's own and others' behavior in teaching and learning events (cited in Edwards, 2017). Cirocki and Farrelly (2016), in turn, also established the nature of reflective teaching and distinguished between three types of reflection such as content reflection (what), process reflection (how), and premise reflection (why). Furthermore, Senge (1990, cited in Taggart & Wilson, 2005 identified three types of reflection; (1) technical reflection, (2) practical reflection, and (3) critical reflection.…”
Section: Components Of Reflective Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclude the conceptual alternatives of reflective teaching described above, first, the most distinct factor described by almost all the researchers in reflective teaching (Ashwin, et al, 2015;Cirocki & Farrelly, 2016;Fatemipour, 2013;Garzon, 2018;Hulsman, Harmsen, & Fabriek, 2009;Pollard, et al, 2014;Ratminingsih, Artini, & Padmadewi, 2018;Richards & Lockhart, 2005;Spalding & Wilson, 2002;Taggart, & Wilson, 2005) is that reflective teaching is a cyclical and conscious process. Therefore, a teacher who uses reflection should know the main concepts of this process.…”
Section: Development Of the Reflective Teaching Model For Reading Commentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the action researchbased program is considered more effective than the regular instruction in improving learners' skills of information literacy. This is shown in table (17). Note.…”
Section: Findings Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In line with the importance of reflective practice, there has been abundant research related to reflective practice in various contexts such as in English language teaching (Cirocki & Widodo, 2019;Lee, 2008;Valdez et al, 2018), teaching English to speakers of other languages (Eickhoff & De Costa, 2018;Farrell, 2016;Nguyen & Ngo, 2018), and in English as a foreign language (Cirocki & Farrelly, 2016;Fakazli & Kuru Gönen, 2017;Rozimela & Tiarina, 2018;Uştuk & De Costa, 2020). In an EFL context like Indonesia, for example, being professional is one expectation for being teachers in the 21 st century (Norahmi, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%