1986
DOI: 10.1093/sw/31.4.282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research and Practice: Orientations of Social Work Educators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies, however (Dea, 1981;Faver et al, 1986;Kirk & Rosenblatt, 1981), suggest that poor statistical performance by students may be a function of faculty characteristics. Unfortunately, few studies have investigated the impact of instructor teaching style or pedagogy on student statistics anxiety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other studies, however (Dea, 1981;Faver et al, 1986;Kirk & Rosenblatt, 1981), suggest that poor statistical performance by students may be a function of faculty characteristics. Unfortunately, few studies have investigated the impact of instructor teaching style or pedagogy on student statistics anxiety.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Despite these concerns about the place of research methods in the social work cumculum, very few articles describe programs which have successfully dealt with these problems (Poulin, 1989;Rosenblatt and Kirk, 1981). In addition to curricular concerns about research methods, a separate but related issue is that little is known about the attitudes of social work educators toward their own research-related activities (Faver, Fox, Hunter, and Shannon, 1986). …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some educators explain this disparity by suggesting that social work students' poor statistical performance may be caused by faculty characteristics or pedagogy (Faver, Fox, Hunter, & Shannon, 1986;Hudson, 1978b;Pan & Tang, 2005;Unrah & Beck, 2004). Others argue that low levels of research success is related to high levels of anxiety (Royse & Rompf, 1992) that reflects the profession's deep-rooted climate of resistance to a science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) curriculum, within which research methods is embedded and changing this climate would require an institutional-level response (Adam, Zosky, & Unrau, 2004;Pan & Tang, 2005).…”
Section: Introduce the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%