Research and development as an initiator of fixed capital investment

Abstract

This paper investigates the causal relationship between firms' research and development expenditures (R&D) and their investments into fixed capital. The literature provides two contrasting views in this respect. The first view holds that a firm's research activity causes, via the creation of inventions, subsequent investment into fixed capital, as the firm needs additional capacities to produce the new goods or services that follow from the inventions. The second view holds that firms' fixed capital investments cause intensified research activity, as novel capital goods from external suppliers offer the firms' researchers a wide range of additional technical possibilities of how to build new prototypes. Using panel data of Swiss firms ranging from 1990 to 2014, the paper applies, contrasting the existing empirical literature only based on VARs, a 2SLS approach to uncover the direction of causality between R&D and fixed capital investment. In order to obtain exogenous instruments, the paper exploits shocks to i) technological opportunities and ii) sales from capital goods suppliers. Results show a one-way causal relationship; we find evidence for that firms' R&D expenditures cause fixed capital investments, but we do not find evidence for the reverse effect. When additionally looking at innovation performance, R&D activities turn out to be complementary to fixed capital investment, in the sense that they markedly increase the expected return on investment. Thus, increasing research activity may not just be valuable for long-run economic growth but, via investment, may also give the economy a head start in times of a prolonged economic downturn.

Financial Distress Determinants During Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence From Non-Financial Firms in Indonesia

“…Tangible capital is highly sensitive to the business cycle. This study is in line with Spescha & Woerter (2021) which stated that fixed capital investment tends to decrease sharply during recessions.…”

The inseparable two: Impact of prior success and failure on new product development project discontinuation

“…Further, the industry average experience is unlikely to influence the discontinuation duration of a firm's projects since the decision is very much project‐ and portfolio‐specific. Our choice of instruments is consistent with other studies that have used similar instruments (Bascle, 2008; Li & Vermeulen, 2021; Spescha & Woerter, 2021). Difference‐in‐Sargan and Stock and Yogo (2005) tests were conducted to confirm that the instruments are exogenous and that they are not weak instruments (Bascle, 2008; Baum et al, 2003).…”

Innovation, Coopetition and Spillover Effects in European Regions

“…As investment is an unavoidable dimension in generating income and jobs, our results prove that it is driven by innovation improvements. This improvement in innovation takes approximately 3 to 4 years to be reflected in the promotion of investment (which favours the causality direction assumed along Equations ( 1)-( 2) (for an enlarged debate of the possible bidirectional causality between investment and innovation, see Spescha & Woerter, 2021). Second, our work subscribes to the standard of high first-order autocorrelation of the investment presented in the works of Caballero and Engel (1999).…”