2016 First IEEE International Conference on Computer Communication and the Internet (ICCCI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cci.2016.7778909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research and comparative analysis of performance test on SDN controller

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yamei et al [17] presented a comparative analysis of the performances of both ONOS and OpenDaylight [15] Controllers using three tools: IXIA Test Instrument(XG12), Cbench, and Mininet. Those tests were done measuring metrics like channel capacity, flow modification delay and cluster fail-over time.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yamei et al [17] presented a comparative analysis of the performances of both ONOS and OpenDaylight [15] Controllers using three tools: IXIA Test Instrument(XG12), Cbench, and Mininet. Those tests were done measuring metrics like channel capacity, flow modification delay and cluster fail-over time.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous works have benchmarked the performance of other SDN controllers, most of them used simulation or emulation tools, such as Cbench. These tools aimed to generate an OpenFlow traffic, which is equivalent to benchmarking ONOS' southbound interface [17]. Since the Intent interface of ONOS represents a major feature in its scalability, it is important to understand in detail how the use of Intents impacts the performance of the controller as a function of the Intent load submitted to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El plano de datos en SDN reenvía el tráfico de red basado en las instrucciones del plano de control. El controlador SDN es el cerebro de esta arquitectura de red y su rendimiento ha sido evaluado en varios trabajos [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Las SDN estaban dirigidas principalmente a redes de centros de datos en su fase inicial de acuerdo con [10] pero han ido evolucionando hacia redes del proveedor de servicio [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…One of them is the study of performance measurement of the Floodlight SDN controller using mininet [8]. In another study, ODL and ONOS are architecturally analyzed and performance of them are compared [9], [10]. In addition to these, there is a study in which ONOS, ODL, Floodlight and Ryu controllers are compared for their performances by extending previous studies [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%