2008
DOI: 10.1080/08853900802191389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rescuing Observed Fixed Effects: Using the Hausman-Taylor Method for Out-of-Sample Trade Projections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, in panel data estimations, OLS estimators may be biased due to endogeneity resulting from the correlation between explanatory variables and time-invariant omitted variables. This has been shown to be true in a variety of contexts (Cheng & Wall, 2002;McPherson & Trumbull, 2008). In our article, it is possible that unobserved and fixed household characteristics are correlated with social networks and attitudes or with exposure to shocks.…”
Section: Endogeneity and Empirical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…First, in panel data estimations, OLS estimators may be biased due to endogeneity resulting from the correlation between explanatory variables and time-invariant omitted variables. This has been shown to be true in a variety of contexts (Cheng & Wall, 2002;McPherson & Trumbull, 2008). In our article, it is possible that unobserved and fixed household characteristics are correlated with social networks and attitudes or with exposure to shocks.…”
Section: Endogeneity and Empirical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Verbeek and Nijman (1992) suggest including three variables in the estimated specifications to test and correct the selection bias: PRES ij , the 12 See Greene (2003) and Baltagi (2005) for a detailed presentation of the HT estimator. This estimator has been used by Carrère (2006) andMcPherson andTrumbull (2008) for gravity models estimated on goods and Walsh (2008) and Bouvatier (2014) for gravity models estimated on services. 13 The distinction between time-variant variables and time-invariant variables is also made in the implementation of the HT estimator.…”
Section: Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the efficiency of the models between fixed effects, random effects and Hausman-Taylor, we show the Hausman test in Table A2 in the annex. The Hausman-Taylor estimation is a panel estimation of random effects with instrumental variables (Baltagi, Bresson, and Pirotte, 2003;McPherson and Trumbull, 2008). The null hypothesis in the Hausman test of comparing fixed effects and random effects does not longer holds if there is a correlation between the observable and unobservable variables, which would imply that the random effects methodology is not recommended.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%